Previous Page  65 / 242 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 65 / 242 Next Page
Page Background

65

Today there is an increasing awareness amongst

knee surgeons about the individual variability

in anatomical shape of the knee and natural

alignment of the leg. Nevertheless we continue

to treat our patients on a relatively uniform

basis, using a limited set of standard component

sizes and shapes, and a surgical technique

aiming at zero degree mechanical limb

alignment in all of our cases.

This dogmatic approach has nevertheless been

relatively successful in the past, with acceptable

results in terms of pain reduction and restoration

of functionality. Despite this, many patients

with artificial knee replacement however

continue to experience functional limitations

and discomfort in the operated joint, especially

when compared to healthy, non-operated peers

of the same age.

The inability to restore the individual’s anatomic

configurationwith our current prosthetic designs

and surgical techniques may be an important

factor in this. The quest towards individualized

surgical strategies and implants in order to

restore the patients individual pre-diseased

profile or status is therefore an attractive path

onto which knee surgeons and implant designers

have recently embarked. The recent progress in

understanding the effect of certain factors such

as gender, morphotype, and native alignment

have lead to a better understanding of the

constituents that determine the individual profile

of the patient’s knee, and these are therefore the

basis towards a potentially more successful

artificial reconstruction of the knee joint.

In this chapter we will focus on each of these

factors, starting with the patient’s pre-diseased

alignment.

Constitutional

alignment

The main purpose of either partial or total knee

arthroplasty has always been to replace the

eroded cartilage and bone by an artificial

implant, usually out of metal and plastic and

which compensates for the erosion or damage.

Whendoing so, restorationof neutralmechanical

alignment has traditionally been considered as

the most important factor with respect to the

durability of the implant. When neutral

mechanicalalignmentisrestored,themechanical

axis of the leg passes through the centre of the

knee, which leads to an even mediolateral load

distribution and a minimized risk for implant

wear and component loosening. For this reason,

several techniques to obtain intraoperative

restoration of mechanical alignment have been

used in the past, usually by referencing from

intramedullary or extramedullary alignment

rods, or using more sophisticated computerized

navigation methods.

Anatomy, kinematics an knee

prostheses; 3D variations in

knee anatomy?

J. Bellemans, J. Oosterbosch, J. Truijen