Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  182 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 182 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

NOTCH PLASTY IN ACL RECONSTRUCTION

181

traumatic injury and not the shape of the top of

the inter-condylar notch.

What we consider important is the percentage

of narrow notch in the second ACL

reconstruction: 54% higher than in the first

cases: 16%.

CONCLUSION

The results presented in this study have found

18,5% of narrow inter-condylar notches in

ACL reconstruction on a group of 200 cases.

We didn’t find any difference in the cases of

ICN concerning bilateral cases, but we did find

a significant increase in cases of narrow ICN

for the second ACL reparation for whom a

notch plasty had been made.

Furthermore, we also didn’t find any difference

in the ICN index between the two groups A

(0,247) and B (0,245). Our population finds

itself in the middle of statistical values but with

little difference in the two groups.

So we have to consider, as the Doctor Beaufil

wrote in his paper, that Notch plasty must only

restore the anatomy if the notch is narrow, but

the plasty should not be made to correct an

anterior position of the ACL graft which is too

significant.

We think that notch plasty could create an

osseous conflict with possible threatening

complications to the graft and it has to remain

reserved for particular indications.

With these indications of narrow inter-condylar

notch aside, the plasty should not be done.

When we have to do it, we should respect the

primary anatomy.

Fig. 2:

Release ACL in narrow intercondylar notch.

Fig. 3:

View after plasty.

Fig. 4:

Intercondylar notch shows a small lateral

osteophytis after one year ACL surgery (DT4) for a

meniscectomy arthroscopy.