Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  185 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 185 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

R.A. MAGNUSSEN

184

cohort to increase by 11% for every 1 point

increase in the Marx activity score [2].

Increased Pre-Reconstruction

Knee Laxity

Another recent MOON cohort study utilized a

group of 2333 patients who underwent primary

isolatedACL reconstruction without collateral or

posterior cruciate ligament injury to assess the

impact of high-grade pre-reconstruction knee

laxity on risk of subsequent revision ACL

reconstruction at 2 years follow-up [3]. Patients

with a Lachman or anterior drawer examination

greater than 10mm different from the

contralateral side, or a 3+ pivot-shift were

classified as having a high-grade laxity. High-

grade pre-operative laxity was noted in

743 patients (31.9%). The presence of high-

grade pre-reconstruction laxity was associated

with significantly increased odds of ACL graft

revision (OR=1.87, 95%CI: 1.19-2.95,

p

=0.007),

controlling for patient age, sex, Marx activity

level, level of competition, and graft type.

Other Potential Predictors

In the analysis of 2683ACL reconstructions with

6-year follow-up, numerous other factors were

evaluated as potential predictors of graft failure

risk [2]. The risk of revision ACL reconstruction

was not significantly associated with patient sex,

smoking status, sport, or meniscus status.

PATIENT FACTORS

AFFECTING PATIENT-

REPORTED OUTCOMES

Knee injury and Osteoarthritis

Outcome Score (KOOS) and

International Knee Documentation

Committee (IKDC) Scores

The MOON group reported 6 year outcomes

on 378 (84%) of 448 unilateral ACL

reconstructions [5]. The specifically reported

factors that predicted IKDC score and two

KOOS subscales: Knee-related quality of life

and sport/recreation function. Pre-operative

scores and prior ipsilateral ACL surgery (that

is to say that patient was undergoing a revision

ACL reconstruction) were noted to be strong

predictors of all three scores at 6 year follow-

up was the (All

p

<0.01). BMI at the time of

surgery was a significant predictor of the

IKDC and KOOS sports/rec at 6 years of

follow-up, with increased BMI associated with

decreased scores. Smoking at the time of

reconstruction was predictive of poorer IKDC

at 6 years follow-up. Increased ago was

associated with slightly higher IKDC scores at

6 years follow-up. Patient ethnicity, sex, and

marital status had no impact on patient-

reported outcomes.

High-grade pre-reconstruction laxity as

described above was not noted to be a predictor

of patient-reported outcomes 2 years following

ACL reconstruction [3].

The presence of a lateral meniscus tear that was

treated with observation was also associated

with better scores at 6 years follow-up on all

three scales. No effect of medial meniscus

status, articular cartilage status, or collateral

ligament status at reconstruction was noted in

any of the scores.

Marx Activity Score

In the previously reported publication of 6 year

outcomes on 378 (84%) of 448 unilateral ACL

reconstructions [5]. Marx activity score prior to

injury was the strongest predictor of Marx

activity level 6 years post-operative. Marx

activity level was also lower at follow-up in

females and those whose index surgery in the

study was a revision ACL reconstruction.

Patient ethnicity, age, and marital status had no

impact on patient-reported outcomes. Patients

who underwent a lateral meniscus repair were

noted to have lower activity level 6 years post-

operative, while medial meniscus, collateral

ligament, and articular cartilage status did not

significantly affect activity level 6 years post-

operative.