Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  190 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 190 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

THE EVOLUTION OF ACL RECONSTRUCTION OVER THE LAST 50 YEARS

189

presentation in Lyon for the first meeting of the

International Society of Knee in 1978, which

revisited his 1976 publication [25]. The novelty

consisted of harvesting the middle third of the

patellar tendon and uses it as a free graft, hence

affording a perfect anatomical position. This

option had previously been proposed by

Brückner [22] in 1966 to reconstruct the ACL

when the ipsilateral patellar tendon was

injured. Brückner then recommended the use

of the contralateral tendon.

This operation became increasingly popular,

the patellar tendon becoming the “gold

standard” for ACL grafts. Some authors

proposed maintaining some continuity between

the patellar tendon and Hoffa’s ligament in

order to improve its vascularization. Others

proposed associating this intra-articular plasty

with a lateral tenodesis [26, 27] to protect the

graft during the process of “ligamentization”,

with an effort to better control internal rotation

stresses to the neo-ligament. During this

period, the femoral tunnel was drilled from

outside to inside. Fixation of the graft was

initially done with wires and extra-articular

screws and subsequently greatly improved by

the use of interference screws. The original

idea goes to Lambert [28] who proposed AO

screws, Kurosaka [29] then developing a more

specific screw design.

As these techniques improved and gained in

reliability, the indication for antero lateral

tenodesis became progressively less necessary.

They increased the surgical burden to the knee

and rendered rehabilitation more difficult

without a proven functional benefit. The

indication for lateral tenodesis persists for

some surgeons in cases of significant laxity or

a proven antero lateral ligament injury.

The introduction of the arthroscope in the late

70’s for meniscal lesions began playing a role

in ACL surgery in the 80’s. Dandy [30] was the

first to use it to reconstruct the ACL using a

synthetic ligament. Since the mid 1980’s we

used the arthroscope to assist, at first only to

drill the tibial tunnel under anterior portal

visualization, the femoral tunnel being drilled

through a postero lateral arthrotomy using a

“rear entry guide”. With the development of

specific femoral guides, we were then able to

create the femoral tunnel from outside to inside

[31] under arthroscopic control. The goal was

to reproduce the anterior portion of the ACL,

namely the antero medial bundle. Its femoral

insertional position is located on the axial wall

of the lateral femoral condyle behind the

“pseudo” femoral isometric point of the ACL.

This gives the neo-ligament a “favorable non

isometry” (relaxed in flexion, taught in

extension), and addressed the parameters in

which the ACL deficient knee seemed to cause

the greatest sense of instability.

The problems posed by the passage of PT bone

blocks into the femoral tunnel drilled from

“outside-in” brought some medical companies

to propose new guides that facilitated drilling

the femoral tunnel “inside-out”. This option

facilitated the passage of the transplant. This

also

introduced

new

concepts

and

understandings of the insertional anatomy of

the ACL as it relates to arthroscopy. The

“inside-out” techniques remain in use today

but, in our opinion, do not offer an ideal

anatomic position with a real bone (and not a

mixed fibrous and bone) tunnel.

Hamstrings grafts

The use of the PT graft posed problems not

only encountered during passage of the bone

block portions of the graft. In addition, risks of

patellar fracture and secondary problems of

patellar tendinitis, residual flexion contracture

and anterior knee pain were discovered.

The use of the hamstring was thought to be a

solution to all these problems. Before becoming

a now widely used technique, many surgeons

had previously used this graft. The first

descriptions are attributable to [32, 33, 34], all

using the semitendinosus or gracilis tendon,

freed proximally to reconstruct the ACL. J.C.

Puddu [35] used the same technique with the

semitendinosus but the tibial tunnel had an

extra articular orifice positioned quite medially,

in a manner to preserve the internal rotational

action of the semitendinosus.