Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  199 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 199 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

T. CUCURULO, E. SERVIEN

198

All the self-evaluation criteria were entered by

the patient using the

websurvey.fr

software

which enabled us to have independent

responses with an online link to the electronic

version of the questionnaires.

RESULTS

Pain

The global analysis of pain score didn’t show

any significant difference between the out­

patient group and the hospitalized group from

the evening of the procedure to D5.

The follow-up of the evolution of the pain in

the days after surgery showed there is an

increase of pain scores between D0 an D1 in

both groups only for patients who had no

controlled pain just after the procedure. In fact,

patients who had low pain in the evening after

surgery remained pain free the following days.

Multifactorial analysis of the postoperative

pain in both groups showed differences

according to the age, the preoperative pain

scale and the procedure time, but no difference

was found between the outpatient group and

the inpatient group. We noticed that there was

no influence of surgical technique (type of

autograft, treatment of chondral or meniscal

lesions) on postoperative pain. The multi­

factorial analysis of the postoperative pain in

the outpatient group permitted to make up a

kind of composite image of the typical painful

outpatient (pain score >7) who is a young girl

(age between 15 and 18), with a preoperative

pain >3 and who underwent a surgery with

tourniquet used more longer than 50 minutes.

There were no differences in the analysis of

VAS regarding to the three modalities of

anesthesia (general, spinal or four nerve blocks

anesthesia).

The analysis of modalities of analgesia by

local anaesthetic (single or continuous nerve

block, intraarticular or donor site injection)

demonstrated a decrease in pain score and

postoperative opioids requirements for patients

who underwent hamstring donorsite injection.

There were no influence in control pain

regarding intraarticular anesthetic injections.

Our results didn’t show a better control of pain

with single or continuous femoral or saphene

nerve blocks compared to periarticular local

anesthetic infiltrations.

Moreover, systemic nonsteroidal anti­

inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have proved in

our study to be valuable in the management of

postoperative pain between D0 and D5. The

use of systemic glucocorticoids (i.v. dexa­

methasone) during the procedure didn’t

improve VAS pain but decreased side effects

such as nausea and vomiting.

Patient satisfaction

Patient satisfaction assessed on D5 was

comparable in the two groups (93% satisfied

patients in the hospitalized group, 94% satisfied

in the outpatient group).

There were no differences in patient satisfaction

regarding the type of graft.

Insufficent control of pain and lack of

preoperative information were the most

frequent causes of unsatisfaction in the out­

patient group (4,8% unsatisfied outpatients).

Whereas 23% of the hospitalized patients

declared they would choose a day case surgery

for a future similar intervention, only 10% in

the outpatient group would request

conventional hospitalization.

Ambulatory failure

We considered as a failure of daycase

ligamentoplasty an outpatient who had to stay

at last one further day of hospitalisation. This

study found 3,4% of day case failure

(23 patients/680), with a great variability

between private centers (2% failure) and Public

Teaching Hospitals (12% failure). The major