Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  213 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 213 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

N. TARDY, M. THAUNAT, B. SONNERY-COTTET, C.G. MURPHY, P. CHAMBAT, J.M. FAYARD

212

mobility exercises. Extension postures had to

be maintained for long periods of time (1 hour

every 4 hours). Complete weight-bearing was

authorized as tolerated. Patients walked with

crutches until extension and quadriceps

contraction during the stance phase were

achieved. All patients were systematically

addressed to a rehabilitation centre for 3 weeks.

Clinical Evaluation

At final follow-up, objective and subjective

International Knee Documentation Committee

(IKDC) forms, KOOS score and activity level

were recorded. The range of motion (ROM)

was measured preoperatively and at follow-up

with a goniometer and compared to the

contralateral healthy knee both for extension

and flexion.

All patients gave their informed consent before

they were included in the study, and the study

protocol was reviewed and approved by the

institutional review board.

Statistical Analysis

The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was

conducted using the GNU GSPP v.3 free

software. A

p

-value <0.05 was considered

significant.

RESULTS

At median follow-up of 38 months (range

6-90 months) after arthrolysis, a total of

12 patients were reviewed (5 women, 7 men).

Two patients were lost to follow-up. The

median age at final follow-up was 36 years

(range 20-56 years).

Knee stiffness was secondary to primary bone-

to-bone ACLR in all 12 patients and associated

with medial menisectomy in 4 cases (Table 1).

All primary surgeries to regain ROM had been

performed in other institutions and all patients

were referred secondarily to our service. Seven

patients had sustained surgery to treat knee

stiffness prior to presenting to our service

(Table 1).

The median time between the primary operation

and the secondary surgical release was

17 months (range 6-84). Surgical findings

during the arthrolysis are summarized in

Table 1. The mean operation time was 54min

(range 40-78min).

Preoperatively, all patients had more than 10°

of extension loss (Table 2). Ten patients

presented a global form of arthrofibrosis with a

combined extension and flexion deficit. Two

patients had more than 10° extension loss with

a flexion loss of less than 15° (“isolated”

extension loss; patients 7 and 8 - Table 2).

At follow-up, all patients except one (93%)

achieved complete extension (Table 2). Only

1 patient (patient 11) (7%) had a residual post-

operative flexion deformity of 5°. Extension

and flexion improvements were highly

significant after arthrolysis (

p

<0.001).

Analysis of mean ROM of the operated knee

before arthrolysis showed 96° ± 14.3°. The

ROM improved significantly after arthrolysis

to 143° ± 7° (

p

<0.001).

Intra-operative findings during arthrolysis are

summarized in Table 1.

No post-operative complications were

recorded. No patients required further open

debridement. No neurovascular deficits were

noted after the posterior release.

Pre- and post-operative objective IKDC scores

as well as post-operative subjective IKDC

scores are shown in Table 2.

The post-operative KOOS distribution was as

follows: pain 93.8 ± 5; symptoms 88 ± 8.6;

ADL 96.8 ± 3.7; sports activities 83.6 ± 12.3;

and quality of life 82.9 ± 8.8.

With regard to the activity level, at follow-up,

all patients (100%) had returned to sport, or

daily living activities for the 2 patients who did