Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  220 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 220 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

EXTENSION DEFICIT AFTER ACL RECONSTRUCTION…

219

procedure. Another limitation is the absence of

a control group.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the procedure involving anterior

arthroscopic arthrolysis and posterior open

release gives good ROM gain and functional

scores without complications in this series.

Prevention of extension contracture after

ACLR is essential, through a better under­

standing of surgical timing, an improved

surgical technique and non-aggressive early

rehabilitation. Nonetheless, open posterior

release should be safely performed only for

rare cases of refractory extension deficit with

significant ROM improvements and patients’

satisfaction.

LITERATURE

[1] WERNER BC, CANCIENNE J, MILLER MD,

GWATHMEY FW. Incidence of manipulation under

anesthesia or lysis of adhesions after arthroscopic knee

surgery.

Am J Sports Med 2015; 43: 1656‑61.

[2] IRRGANG JJ, HARNER CD. Loss of motion following

knee ligament reconstruction.

Sports Med 1995; 19: 150‑9.

[3] MAYR HO, STÖHR A. Arthroscopic treatment of

arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction. Local and

generalized arthrofibrosis.

Oper Orthop Traumatol 2014;

26: 7‑18.

[4] BENUM P. Operative mobilization of stiff knees after

surgical treatment of knee injuries and posttraumatic

conditions.

Acta Orthop Scand 1982; 53: 625‑31.

[5] FREILING D, LOBENHOFFER P. The surgical

treatment of chronic extension deficits of the knee.

Oper

Orthop Traumatol 2009; 21: 545‑56.

[6] LOBENHOFFER HP, BOSCH U, GERICH TG. Role of

posterior capsulotomy for the treatment of extension deficits

of the knee.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1996; 4:

237‑41.

[7] LOBENHOFFER P, GERICH T, HERNANDEZ R.

Therapy of extension deficits of the knee joint by arthroscopic

arthrolysis and dorsal capsulotomy.

Unfallchirurg 1996; 99:

487‑91

.

[8] MILLETT PJ, WILLIAMS RJ 3

rd

, WICKIEWICZ TL.

Open debridement and soft tissue release as a salvage

procedure for the severely arthrofibrotic knee.

Am J Sports

Med 1999; 27: 552‑61.

[9] COSGAREA A, DE HAVEN K, LOVELOCK J. The

surgical treatment of arthrofibrosis of the knee.

Am J Sports

Med 1994; 22: 184‑91.

[10] DANDY D, EDWARDS D. Problems in regaining full

extension of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament

reconstruction: does arthrofibrosis exist?

Knee Surg Sports

Traumatol Arthrosc 1994; 2: 76‑9.

[11] JACKSON D, SCHAEFFER R. Cyclops syndrome:

loss of extension following intra-articular anterior cruciate

ligament reconstruction.

Arthroscopy 1990; 6: 171‑8.

[12] HOWELL S, CLARK J, FARLEY T. A rationale for

predicting anterior cruciate graft impingement by the

intercondylar roof. Amagnetic resonance imaging study.

Am

J Sports Med 1991; 19: 276‑82.

[13] MUELLNER T, KDOLSKY R, GROOSSCHMIDT K,

SCHABUS R, KWASNY O, PLENK H. Cyclops and

cyclopoid formation after anterior cruciate ligament

reconstruction: clinical and histomorphological differences.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1999; 7: 284‑9

.

[14] WINDSOR R, INSALL J. Exposure in revision total

knee arthroplasty: The femoral peel.

Tech Orthop 1988; 3:

1‑4.

[15] MILLETT PJ, WICKIEWICZ TL, WARREN RF.

Motion loss after ligament injuries to the knee. Part II:

prevention and treatment.

Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29:

822‑8.

[16] LIND M, MENHERT F, PEDERSEN AB. The first

results from the Danish ACL reconstruction registry:

epidemiologic and 2 year follow-up results from 5,818 knee

ligament reconstructions.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol

Arthrosc 2009; 17: 117‑24.

[17] MAYR HO, WEIG TG, PLITZ W. Arthrofibrosis

following ACL reconstruction-reasons and outcome.

Arch

Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124: 518‑22.

[18] STRUM GM, FRIEDMAN MJ, FOX JM, FERKEL

RD, DOREY FH, DEL PIZZO W,

et al.

Acute anterior

cruciate ligament reconstruction. Analysis of complications.

Clin Orthop 1990; 253: 184‑9.

[19] HARNERCD, IRRGANG JJ, PAULJ, DEARWATERS,

FU FH. Loss of motion after anterior cruciate ligament

reconstruction.

Am J Sports Med 1992; 20: 499‑506.

[20] SHELBOURNE KD, PATEL DV, MARTINI DJ.

Classification and Management of Arthrofibrosis of the Knee

after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Am

J Sports Med 1996; 24: 857‑62.

[21] EVANS S, SHAGINAW J, BARTOLOZZI A. ACL

reconstruction - it’s all about timing.

Int J Sports Phys Ther

2014; 9: 268‑73.

[22] KWOK CS, HARRISON T, SERVANT C. The optimal

timing for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with

respect to the risk of postoperative stiffness.

Arthroscopy

2013; 29: 556-65.

[23] QUELARD B, SONNERY-COTTET B, ZAYNI R,

OGASSAWARA R, PROST T, CHAMBAT P. Preoperative

factors correlating with prolonged range of motion deficit

after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Am J Sports

Med 2010; 38: 2034‑9.