Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  223 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 223 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

P. LANDREAU

222

previous questions generate this one: When

will the risk of re-injury be at the lower possible

level in order to authorize the player to return

to sport?

WHAT DOES IT MEAN

“RETURN TO PLAY” AND

WHAT IS THE ACTUAL

RATE?

In their meta-analysis, Arden

et al.

(Forty-eight

studies evaluating 5770 participants at a mean

follow-up of 41.5 months were included for

review) demonstrated that while 82% of

patients returned to some form of sports

participation following ACL reconstruction

surgery, only 63% of patients were able to

return to their pre-injury level and only about

half of patients returned to competitive sport

after ACL reconstruction surgery [2].

In another study, the same group showed that

while two-thirds of patients had attempted

some form of sport by 12 months following

their surgery, only one-third had returned to

their pre-injury level of competitive sport

participation [3].

In a more selected population, including

motivated professional athletes, it is probable

that the rate of return to same level and

competition should be better but the patient

must be informed about the actual rate in order

to fit his/her expectations.

WHICH FACTORS SHOULD

BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDE­

RATION TO CONDUCT THE

CUSTOMIZED RETURN TO

PLAY PROCESS?

Different factors must be taken into account to

allow the patient to move from one step to

another during his rehabilitation and return to

play: the biology (fixation, integration and

maturation of the graft according to the type of

graft) the neuromuscular control and the

psychological factors.

The biology

The fixation and the maturation of the graft

should be considered.

Even if there are some controversies in li­

terature, it seems that there is no evidence that

one graft shouldbe superior to another concerning

return to sport and risk of re-rupture [4].

However, the consolidation of the bone plugs

in the tunnels has been shown to be faster than

the tendon tunnel integration. Therefore,

prudence is advised especially after hamstrings

reconstruction.

The development of the fixation systems have

facilitated the modern rehabilitation protocols

allowing immediate weight bearing, less knee

immobilization, early and unrestricted range of

motion, early recovery of neuromuscular

function and therefore, early return to physical

activity. The bone integration is different

according to bone-tendon-bone graft or tendon

grafts. It can take up to 4-6 months before

complete bone integration; then a minimum of

4-6 months should be respected before to return

to play only according to the bone integration.

The maturation of the graft has been studied on

animals. The three phases of healing and their

approximate timelines in animal models are

remodeling (first 4 weeks postoperatively),

maturation (weeks 4-12), and ligamentization

(from 12 weeks). It has been demonstrated that

there are substantially reduced mechanical

properties of the graft in the first 8-12 weeks.

This notion has not been demonstrated in

human population and appears to contradict

the successful clinical outcomes reported

after accelerated rehabilitation programs.

Additionally, there are some controversy

concerning the properties of the tendon graft in

human population. This graft could undergo a

process of adaptation rather than a

ligamentization or restoration of native ACL

[5]. We miss further research to accurately