Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  229 / 324 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 229 / 324 Next Page
Page Background

cement is antibiotic loaded Palacos (62.1% of

cases) [14]. The current cost of these compo-

nents prior to any locally negotiated discounts

was obtained from the implant company repre-

sentatives. The sum cost for each procedure

was calculated based on these figures and

quantitatively compared based on current NJR

usage figures. Those elements of the surgical

procedure that are not known differ consistent-

ly between UKA and TKA were excluded

from calculations. Equivalent costs were assu-

med for theatre and medical staff, theatre

consumables, instrument sterilisation, dres-

sings, IV fluids, and peri-operative drugs and

anaesthetic agents.

The hospital episode

The NJR has published data on the average

length of stay (LOS) for TKA and UKA based

on 73,967 cemented TKA and 4,484 UKA pro-

cedures carried out between April 2003 and

September 2006 [14]. The cost of a day in an

NHS hospital orthopaedic ward was estimated

using figures provided by the management

team in our institution (Charing Cross

Hospital, London) for the running of our

20 bedded ring fenced elective orthopaedic

ward. These data were combined with current

LOS figures from the NJR to estimate the cost

of the hospital episode for each TKA and UKA

procedure. Elements of the hospital stay that

do not differ consistently between UKA and

TKA were excluded from analysis. These

included the cost of pre-operative or post-ope-

rative investigations, IV fluids, compressive

stockings and dressings.

The cost of an active contraint robotic

UKA

The cost of custom made prostheses using

modern manufacturing processes was establi-

shed, and the cost of manufacture of a current

active constraint robot with a maintenance

contract and disposables calculated based

upon a usage of 50 and 100 cases a year.

RESULTS

Applicability of UKA

Of the 200 knees reviewed, 9 cases undergoing

surgery for revision or rheumatoid arthritis

were excluded. The remaining 191 radio-

graphs were categorised as shown in Figure 1.

14

es

JOURNÉES LYONNAISES DE CHIRURGIE DU GENOU

228

Fig. 1 : Histogram showing the distributing of patterns of knee arthritis