Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  43 / 460 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 43 / 460 Next Page
Page Background

M. Nelitz, H. Reichel, S. Lippacher

42

under fluoroscopic control. A guide pin is

placed at the femoral insertion. Fluoroscopy is

used to confirm the correct placement of the

guide-pin sparing the distal femoral physis.

Due to the concave curvature of the distal

femoral physis, the lateral radiograph alone

can be misleading for the determination of the

relation between the distal femoral physis and

the medial patellofemoral ligament [11, 18].

The cross-reference onto an AP view shows

that the same point that is projected on or

proximal to the physis on the lateral view is

distal to the physis on the AP view (fig. 2).

After meticulous verification of the entry-

point the guide-pin is drilled to the lateral

epicondyle distal to the physis (fig. 4). Then a

medial blind tunnel is drilled along the guide

pin to accommodate a double thickness of

graft to an adequate depth to allow optimal

graft tensioning.

The graft is then pulled between the second and

third layer to the femoral insertion point (fig. 3).

A locking suture is passed through the trans­

epicondylar axis pulling the graft into the medial

tunnel. The knee is cycled several times from

full flexion to full extension with the graft under

tension. In this way, the graft is prestretched.

The graft is then secured within the medial

condyle tunnel using a bioresorbable interferen­

ce screw with the knee flexed to 30° (fig. 5).

Fig. 1 : Double bundle insertion of the graft (arrows)

reconstructs the wide span of the patellar insertion

of the native MPFL.

Fig. 2 : Intraoperative cross-reference of the physis on the lateral view onto an ap view shows that the

same point that is projected on or proximal to the physis on the lateral view is distal to the physis on the

AP view.