Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  51 / 460 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 51 / 460 Next Page
Page Background

F. Chotel, A. Peltier, A. Viste, M.M. Chaker, J. Bérard

50

Results

Initial experience with MPFL

This is about the 13first patients (series presented

at 2010 EPOS meeting) [3]. No permanent or

habitual dislocation was included in this study.

Inclusion criteria were:

i)

major objective patella

instability with 2 or more patella dislocations,

ii)

all trochlear dysplasia/apprehension test +

(fig. 3),

iii)

no previous surgery.

After a mean of 10.5 months (range, 3-23)

follow-up after surgery, no recurrent episodes

of dislocation or subluxation were reported.

Mean Kujala score was of 90.2 (range, 84-99)

at latest follow-up. For all patients the moving

patellar apprehension test was positive before

and negative after surgery. A firm end point to

lateral patellar translation was noticed in all

patients at latest follow-up (fig. 4).

Objective assessment with CT noted that the

patellar tilt on relaxed quadriceps was

significantly improved from 28° preoperatively

(range, 16-41) to 16° at follow-up (range, 7-32).

The patellar tilt on contracted quadriceps was

significantly improved from 35° preoperatively

(range, 21-52) to 24.6° at follow-up (range, 11-

48) (fig. 5).

Fig.3:Typicalpositivemovingpatellarapprehension

test (look at patient’s hands).

Fig. 4: In our experience, moving patellar apprehe­

nsion test (or Smilie test) was always find negative

post-operatively in the series treated with MPFL

reconstruction.

Fig. 5: Patellar tilt during

contracted Q and CT scan.

Before and after MPFL

reconstruction in a young

child with habitual patella

dislocation. The patella

tunnel can be noticed.