Previous Page  203 / 242 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 203 / 242 Next Page
Page Background

203

Introduction

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA)

provides an alternative to total knee arthroplas­

ty (TKR) in patients with monocompartmental

arthritis. The prerequisites cited in retrospective

studies for a UKA, include unicompartmental

disease, functioning anterior cruciate ligament

(ACL), tibiofemoral angles between physio­

logical valgus and 10° varus and no subluxation

are largely accepted [17, 21], although the

boundaries continue to expand.

Failure is nevertheless increasing; the

inexorable consequence of increasing numbers

of procedures. Conversion of the failed UKA to

TKR shows favourable outcomes, but the

complexity of revision surgery remains

debatable, and the causes of failure different

between medial and lateral unicompartmental

arthroplasties. Not infrequently, papers

discussing ‘the failed UKA’ seem to be

synonymous with Medial UKA. Few studies

compare the differences between the revision

of these two types of prostheses to TKR. The

purpose of this paper is to examine the

differences between the revision of Medial and

Lateral UKAs to TKR.

Medialand Lateral

UKA; not synonymous

In considering revising medial and lateral

prostheses, it is important to remember that

they are different creatures, with different

indications, biomechanics, kinematics, and for

different patterns of wear.

In terms of frequency, Lateral UKAs are

performed between one in ten and one in fifteen

times less than medial UKAs, therefore make

up less than 1% of knee prostheses implanted

[58]. Indications are subtly different between

medial and lateral UKA [2, 4, 42, 50], as are the

diagnoses leading to unicompartmental

arthroplasty. Series for either medial or lateral

UKA where authors cite their respective

indication are shown in Table 1. For series

reporting indications for lateral UKA, primary

osteoarthritis by far themost common indication,

with sequalae of trauma next most common [2,

4, 39, 44, 54]. Argenson’s series aside, UKA for

osteonecrosis is not cited as an indication.

Medial UKA indications are performed

overwhelmingly for OA, with osteonecrosis

(0.8% to 6%) and sequalae of trauma (0.4% to

4.5%) much less common [9, 31, 60].

Revisions of UKAwith TKA;

Medial versus Lateral UKA

C.G. Murphy, T. Aїt Si Selmi, M. Bonnin