207 / 242
Revisions of UKA with TKA; Medial versus Lateral UKA
207
Author
Year
Time to Follow Up given
N°. of UKAs studied
Medial UKA
Lateral UKA
N°. of U2T
Indications for Revision
Progression of OA
Aseptic loosening
Pain
Poly wear / failure
Malalignement
Component / Peripros #
Sepsis
Author
Koskonen (FJR)
32
2007 18 years period
1819
234 (M/L unspec) *Any revision 33% 44%
9% 6% 3%
Squire 61
1999 min 15 years
140 125 15 14 (M/L unspec)
*Any revision 50% 42%
Baker (UKWJR)
5
2012 7 years period
1402 1331 71
Unspecified *Any revision 4% 29% 24%
5% M Vs
4% M
30% M Vs
24% L
25% M Vs
21% L
5% M Vs
4% L
6% M Vs
1% L
5% M Vs
10% L
Lewold (SJR)
36
1998 20 years
1135 995
678 M *Any revision 26% 43%
14%
140
100 L
25% M
Vs 4% L
45% M Vs
31% L
11% M
Vs 8% L
Saragaglia (SFHG)
56
2013 unscecified
418 368 50 371 (M/L unspec) *Any revision 13% 44% 4% 13% 6% 4%
Medial Only
Saragaglia
57
2009 12 years period
33 0
33
4
21
7
1
Oduwole
43
2010 5 years period
106 106 0
13
2
4
2
1
2
Saldanha
55
2007 mean post revision 2 years
1060 36 0
36
13
14
4
4
Pandit
48
2011 mean 5 years (1-11)
1000 1000 0
19
*Any revision
9
1
6
6
5
Sierra
60
2013 min post op review 2 years
175 175 0
175
59
96
7
5
5
Robb
52
2013 mean post op review 3 years 494 24 0
24
2
12
34
1
1
Koskinen
31
2009 mean 7 years follow up
46 46 0
6
3
3
Bergeson
9
2013 post op review 2 years
839 40 0
unspecified
2
15
12
2
Table 2 (suite): Failed UKA; Laterality, Study size, Indications for Revision.