Previous Page  208 / 242 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 208 / 242 Next Page
Page Background

C. Murphy, T. Aїt Si Selmi, M. Bonnin

208

revision rate for Oxford Unicompartmental

knees that reduced from 20 to 7% if the surgeon

performed more than 23 cases per year [37],

while in the Norwegian registry series hospitals

performing 25-50 UKAs per year had a 40%

decrease in revision rate compared to those

performing less than 10 procedures per year

[19]. The numbers of revisions from UKA to

TKA are highlighted in Table 2 under (U2Ts)

where presented, and numbers range from one

single revision [51] to 678 Medial UKAs to

TKA [36].

Laterality and survival

One of the problems with analysis of joint

register data pertaining to UKA has been a

failure to consider medial and lateral implants

separately, for both survival and mode of

failure. Early studies report five to ten year

failure rate for Lateral UKA of around 82% [4,

21, 24]. Up to ten year survival rates of 92%

and 98% have been reported [2, 8, 39], and

both Sah and Pennington report series with

100% survival at a mean of 5.2 and 12.4 years

respectively [50, 54].

When considered together, Lateral UKA

account for a low proportion of Revised UKAs

[7, 13, 14, 45, 61], making interpretation of

data difficult, ranging between 4% [51] to 21%

[12]. Lewold et al reporting on the Swedish

register were the first to stratify indication for

revision by side, finding broadly similar

indications for revision [36]. The study by

Table 3: Conversion of UKA to TKA; use of implants, grafts, augments.

Author

Year U2T

Comments

Barrett

7

1987 29 27 CR TKR, Half Stem/Augment +with screw +cement/Bone graft

Chatain

13

2004 54 39 TKR, 14 Rev TKR including stemmed, 1 hinged.

Saldanha

55

2007 36 6 constrained, 2 semi-constrained, 6 stems, 2 augments, 2 Bone

graft

Lewold

36

2008 778 750 TKR (655 Medial, 95 lat), 28 constrained (23 medial 5 lateral)

Oduwole

43

2010 13 7 TKR, 6 requiring Stem/Augment/Bone graft

Pandit

48

2011 19 17 TKR, 2 Rev TKR Stems &/Wedges

Chou

14

2012 33 Stems 12, wedges 7

Pearse

49

2012 205 Any revision prostheis 28%, Stems 22%, wedges 14%

Robb

52

2013 24 Stemmed 8, Tibial augments 3, hinged 1

Sierra

60

2013 175 PS 88, CR 81, constrained 6, Augments 53, Stems 67

Saragaglia

56

2013 371 67% PS, 33% CR, 4% Rotating hinge.

Bone Loss: F41%, T50%,

Bone Graft F 31, T 112 (47% morcelised, 38% corticocancellous,

10% segmental allograft)

Augments: F2, T25, Stem: 18F, 18T

U2T

Number of conversions of UKA to TKA.

PS

Posterostabilised

CR

Cruciate retaining

F

Femur

T

Tibia

Rev

Revision