Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  101 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 101 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

S. ZAFFAGNINI, G. CARBONE, A. GRASSI, F. RAGGI, T. ROBERTI DI SARSINA, C. SIGNORELLI

100

consequently, of the graft on the femur.

Biomechanically, it ensures good results if

compared to anatomic double boundles re­

construction and other techniques. It represents

a good option for skeletally immature patient

and for revision cases. Finally, it’s an easy

surgery, very reliable and cheap, because it

doesn’t require dedicate instruments.

LITERATURE

[1] KOPF S, MUSAHL V, TASHMAN S

et al.

A systematic

review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology

of the ACL.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy:

official journal of the ESSKA 2009; 17: 213-219 DOI:

10.1007/s00167-008-0709-5.

[2] ROBINSON J, STANFORD FC, KENDOFF D

et al.

Replication of the range of native anterior cruciate ligament

fiber length change behavior achieved by different grafts:

measurement using computer-assisted navigation.

The

American journal of sports medicine 2009; 37: 1406-11

DOI: 10.1177/0363546509331941

.

[3] SASAKI N, ISHIBASHI Y, TSUDA E

et al.

The femoral

insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament: discrepancy

between macroscopic and histological observations.

Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery:

official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North

America and the International Arthroscopy Association

2012; 28: 1135-46 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.12.021.

[4] WEILER A, HOFFMANN RF, BAIL HJ

et al.

Tendon

healing in a bone tunnel. Part II: Histologic analysis after

biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior

cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep.

Arthroscopy: the

journal of arthroscopic & related surgery: official publication

of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the

International Arthroscopy Association 2002; 18: 124-35.

[5] KAWAGUCHI Y, KONDO E, TAKEDAR

et al.

The role

of fibers in the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate

ligament in resisting tibial displacement.

Arthroscopy: the

journal of arthroscopic & related surgery: official

publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America

and the International Arthroscopy Association 2015; 31:

435-44 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.08.033.

[6] ZAFFAGNINI S, MARTELLI S, ACQUAROLI F.

Computer investigation of ACL orientation during passive

range of motion.

Computers in biology and medicine 2004;

34: 153-63 DOI: 10.1016/S0010-4825(03)00041-6.

[7] MUSAHL V, PLAKSEYCHUK A, VANSCYOC A

et al.

Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint

and isometric positions: effect on kinematics of the anterior

cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee.

The American journal

of

sports

medicine

2005;

33:

712-8

DOI:

10.1177/0363546504271747.

[8] PEARLE AD, SHANNON FJ, GRANCHI C

et al.

Comparison of 3-dimensional obliquity and anisometric

characteristics of anterior cruciate ligament graft positions

using surgical navigation.

The American journal of sports

medicine2008;36:1534-41DOI:10.1177/0363546508315536.

[9] CROSS MB, MUSAHL V, BEDI A

et al.

Anteromedial

versus central single-bundle graft position: which anatomic

graft position to choose?

Knee surgery, sports traumatology,

arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA 2012; 20: 1276-

81 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1737-0.

[10] MARCACCI M, ZAFFAGNINI S, IACONO F

et al.

Arthroscopic intra- and extra-articular anterior cruciate

ligament reconstruction with gracilis and semitendinosus

tendons.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy:

official journal of the ESSKA 1998; 6: 68-75 DOI: 10.1007/

s001670050075.

[11] MARCACCI M, ZAFFAGNINI S, GIORDANO G

et

al.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction associated with

extra-articular tenodesis: A prospective clinical and

radiographic evaluation with 10- to 13-year follow-up.

The

American journal of sports medicine 2009; 37: 707-14 DOI:

10.1177/0363546508328114.

[12] ZAFFAGNINI S, SIGNORELLI C, LOPOMO N

et al.

Anatomic double-bundle and over-the-top single-bundle

with additional extra-articular tenodesis: an

in vivo

quantitative assessment of knee laxity in two different ACL

reconstructions.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology,

arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA 2012; 20: 153-

159 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1589-7.

[13] McCARTHY MM, TUCKER S, NGUYEN JT

et al.

Contact stress and kinematic analysis of all-epiphyseal and

over-the-top pediatric reconstruction techniques for the

anterior cruciate ligament.

The American journal of sports

medicine2013;41:1330-9DOI:10.1177/0363546513483269.