Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  175 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 175 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

M. VALOROSO, G. LA BARBERA, G. DEMEY, D. DEJOUR

174

ACL rupture leads to antero-posterior and

rotatory instability. The last one, described by

patients as “knee giving away”, is clinically

demonstrated by the pivot-shift (PS) test.

However, it is difficult to find a gold standard

method for its quantification. The devices used to

quantify this test are usually complex and bulky.

Recently, the accelerometer KIRA

TM

shows

promising and reliable results. The limit of this

system is that a learning curve to performproperly

the PS is required. The objective evaluation of PS

allows the surgeon to confirm the clinical

diagnosis in case ofACL rupture and to verify the

ACL status after the reconstruction [12].

GENDER AND HYPER-

LAXITY

ACL injury occurs with a 4- to 6-fold greater

incidence in female athletes compared to male

athletes playing the same landing and cutting

sports. The mechanism responsible for the

gender disparity in ACL injury risk is

multifactorial and it is related both to extrinsic

(neuromuscular and sport activities) and

intrinsic factors (anatomical and hormonal

differences between genders) [13].

During the menstrual cycle phase, several

authors observe that estrogen reduces the rate

of fibroblast proliferation and type I procollagen

synthesis, while progesterone has an opposite

effect [14]. ACL biomechanical properties may

be influenced by fluctuations in estrogen and

progesterone concentrations, increasing the

risk of ACL rupture during the pre-ovulatory

phase [4].

In literature, the Beighton score is frequently

used to quantify the whole body joint laxity. In

a military cadet prospective cohort study, it is

reported that an increased generalized joint

laxity is a significant predictor of ACL ruptures

in both males and females. More specifically,

cadets with a Beighton score >5 are 2,8 times

more likely to sustain an ACL rupture [10].

Moreover, increased knee hyperextension

(genu recurvatum) of 10° and hamstring

flexibility are significantly associated with risk

of ACL lesion [4].

GENETIC RISK FACTORS

Familial predisposition and specific genetic

variants are described as other possible risk

factors for ACL lesion. Retrospective studies

report a familial predisposition to ACL tears.

Patients with bilateral ACL ruptures show a

highly significant incidence of ACL injury in

the family members compared to control

healthy subjects (35% versus 4% respectively).

Moreover, patients with an ACL lesion are

more likely to have a relative with an ACL

rupture compared with individuals without any

history of ACL tear. The risk is slightly

increased when only first-degree relatives are

considered. The familial predisposition of ACL

injury may probably due to the role of specific

genetic variants within genes (COL1A1,

COL5A1, and COL12A1) encoding for the

extracellular matrix and predisposing to ACL

fragility [4].

TREATMENT

During ACL reconstruction, the surgeon has to

consider all the modifiable intrinsic risk factors

such as narrow notch, increased PTS, postero-

medial meniscal lesion and a significant

rotatory instability. Several authors suggest

that the notchplasty is a possible solution for

graft impingement and it is particularly advised

in case of revision surgery. The menisci have to

be preserved during the surgery not only to

prevent the chondral degeneration but also to

improve the anterior and rotational stability.

We suppose that the posterior horn of the

medial meniscus acts like a “wedge” reducing

the anterior tibial translation.

The anterolateral plasty should be used as an

associated procedure both in primary and

revision ACL surgery for patients that

demonstrate an excessive anterolateral rotatory

laxity (fig. 4). In a recent systematic review,