

ANALYSE À LA MARCHE DE DEUX SÉRIES HOMOGÈNES DE 40 PATIENTS OPÉRÉS DE PTG…
255
REFERENCES
[1] BUECHEL FF Long term follow up after mobile-
bearing
TKR CORR 2002; 404: 40-50.
[2] BACK DL, CANNON SR, HILTON A
et al.
The
Kinemax TKA Nine years experience.
JBJS Br 2001: 83:
359-63.
[3] MALLON WJ, CALLAGHAN JJ Total joint replace-
ment in active golfers.
J South Orthop Assoc 1994; 3: 295-8.
[4] RANAWAT CS Design may be counterproductive for
optimizing flexion after TKR,
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003,
416: 174-6.
[5] AYERS DC, FRANKLIN PD, PLOUTZ-SNYDER R,
BOISVERT CB Total knee replacement outcome and coex-
isting physical and emotional illness.
Clin Orthop Relat Res,
2005, 440: 157-6.
[6] BOZIC KJ, KURTZ, SM, LAU E
et al.
The
Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the
United States.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(1): 45-51.
[7] KEATING EM, MEDING JB, FARIS PM, RITTER MA,
Long-term follow-up of nonmodular total knee replace-
ments,
Clin Orthop Relat Res November 2002, 404: 34-9.
[8] KOMISTECK RD, MAHFOUZ MR, DENNIS DA
Biomechanics of the knee in Orthopaedic Knowledge Update
Hip and Knee Reconstruction.
2006, Chapter 2: 17-29.
[9] PERRY J, BURNFIELD JH Pathological gait section III
in Gait analysis Normal and Pathological Function.
2010
Slack Inc.: 165-259.
[10] MCCLELLAND JA, WEBSTER KE, FELLER JA
Gait analysis of patients following total knee replacement: A
systematic review,
The Knee, 2007; 14 (4): 253-63.
[11] HILDING MB, LANSHAMMAR H, RYD L Knee
joint loading and tibial component loosening. RSA and gait
analysis in 45 osteoarthritic patients before and after TKA.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1996; 78 (1): 66-73.
[12] ANDRIACCHI TP Functional analysis of pre- and post
knee surgery Total knee arthroplasty and ACL reconstruc-
tion.
J Biomech Eng; 1993; 115: 575-58.
[13] SISTON RA, GIORI NJ, GOODMAN SB and DELP
SL Surgical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: A per-
spective.
Journal of Biomechanics, 2007, 40: 728-35.
[14] KESSLER O, BULL AMJ, AMIS AA A method to
quantify alteration of knee kinematics caused by changes of
TKR positioning,
J Biomech. 2009, Volume 42, Issue 6,
Pages 665-70.
[15] CHOONG PF, DOWSEY MM, STONEY JD. Does
accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and
quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assist-
ed total knee arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(4): 560-9.
[16] LONGSTAFF LM, SLOAN K, STAMP N
et al.
Good
Alignment After Total Knee Arthroplasty Leads to Faster
Rehabilitation and Better Function.
Journal of Arthroplasty.
2009; 24(4): 570-8.
[17] DUJARDIN F, WEBER J Anatomie and physiologie de
la marche des positions assise et debout.
EMC (Elsevier,
Paris) 1998 ; 14-010-A-10 16p.
[18] BAUWENS K, MATTHES G, WICH M
et al.
Navigated Total Knee Replacement. A Meta-Analysis.
J
Bone Joint Surg (A). 2007;89: 261-9.
[19] TINGART M, LÜRING C, BÄTHIS H
et al.
Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the con-
ventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical
routine?
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy,
2008, 16 (1): 44-50.
[20] BULL AM, KESSLER O, ALAM M
et al
Changes in
knee kinematics reflect the articular geometry after arthroplas-
ty.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2008, Vol: 466, Pages: 2491-9.
[21] PICARD F
et al.
Using navigation intra-operative mea-
surements narrowsrange of outcomes in TKA
Clin Orthop
Relat Res 2007, 463: 50-7.
[22] CLEMENS U, MIEHLKE RK Advanced Navigation
Planning Including Soft Tissue Management.
Orthopedics
2005, 28 (10): 1259-62.