Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  181 / 460 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 181 / 460 Next Page
Page Background

S. Lippacher, H. Reichel, M. Nelitz

180

Materials and methods

Lateral radiographs and transverse MRI T2-

weighted scans of fifty knees in fifty patients

with patellar instability that were referred to

our outpatient-clinic between 2007 and 2010

for subsequent surgery were analyzed. None of

these patients had prior surgery of the knee.

Patients with insufficient X-ray or MRI were

excluded. In all included patients routine

X-rayswere taken to evaluate the patellofemoral

joint. The lateral view was taken in the supine

position and 0° knee flexion with superimposed

condyles [17]. During clinical assessment a

firm typing was made using the D. Dejour’s

classification.

This study compares the reliability and accuracy

of two diagnostic studies in grading the severity

of trochlear dysplasia.

The radiographic study (method 1) included a

correct plain lateral view of the knee.According

to D. Dejour [9] on lateral radiographs four

different types of trochlear dysplasia were

distinguished (fig. 1, 2).

Fig. 1: Classification of trochlear dysplasia according to D. Dejour (reprintedwith David Dejour’s permission):

1 – crossing sign, 2 – supratrochlear bump or spur, 3 – double contour, 4 – vertical join or cliff pattern.

Fig. 2:

A: Normal patellofemoral joint.

B: trochlear dysplasia with crossing sign (1), small

supratrochlear bump or spur (2), double contour