Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  243 / 460 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 243 / 460 Next Page
Page Background

K.F. Almqvist, A.A.M. Dhollander, P. Verdonk, J. Victor

242

is compromised by its function as a weight

bearing joint. With abnormal use or increasing

age, the involved joint will present the common

anatomical changes of osteoarthritis. In postural

primary osteoarthritis the joint is subjected to

increased loading due to static abnormalities

with degenerative changes as a result, e.g. in the

knee due to trochleodysplasia or patella alta.

In secondary osteoarthritis the joint tissues are

abnormal at the onset of the disease. This

condition can occur when the articular cartilage

has previously been affected by transient but

recurrent inflammation of the synovial mem­

brane as seen in haemochromatosis, in chondro­

calcinosis or in burned-out rheumatoid arthritis.

Inherited disorders of articular cartilage collagen

molecules and metabolic disorders such as

ochronosis, acromegaly and chondrocalcinosis

can also be the underlying cause of this subgroup

of osteoarthritis. Furthermore, secondary osteo­

arthritis will be present in joints in which the

subchondral bone has previously been affected

e.g. after intra-articular fractures or chondral

trauma. Secondary osteoarthritis has a higher

incidence in patients who also present primary

osteoarthritis.

Trauma to a joint with articular incongruity and

recurrent instability will also generate

osteoarthritic changes. The development of

clinical and radiological osteoarthritis in these

weight bearing joints is more frequent in people

with generalized osteoarthritis than in those

without.

Genetic, metabolic and endocrine (primary)

factors will alter the physical properties of

articular cartilage determining who will be a

candidate for developing osteoarthritis, whereas

trauma or increased stress determine when and

where osteoarthritis will occur.

Since the progression of the disease is slow, the

symptoms occur at an advanced age, at variable

intervals after the initiating event. The

degenerative changes are more related to

impact loading than to frictional wear.

Defining and diagnosis of early knee

OA

[14]

Usually the diagnosis of knee OA can be made

by history and physical examination including

signs/symptoms of knee pain with joint

stiffness, joint crepitus and functional limita­

tions of the knee, typically in a population

above 45-50 years old. Diagnosis is confirmed

by conventional radiographs demonstrating

changes such as joint space narrowing, osteo­

phytes, subchondral bone sclerosis and cysts.

The radiograps are graded according to

Kellgren (II-IV) or in the patellofemoral joint

graded according to Iwano. Early OA of the

knee is somewhat more complicated as the

patient show limited and sporadic signs/

symptoms, only becoming manifest under

certain conditions such as after long term

loading (jogging or other sports activities…).

This early form of knee OA is thought to be a

process that displays a number of tissue related

phenomena leading to the loss of homeostasis

of the knee, and in most cases leading to

established OA. It is the clinical recurrence of

pain and discomfort of the knee, short periods

of stiffness, with in between long periods of

very little clinical manifestations eg. slight

swelling of the joint, probably due to sponta­

neous adaption of the patient, that sets the

clinician to perform additional investigations

(radiographs, ultrasound, MR or arthroscopy).

In these cases the history and the clinical

examination often suggest a local problem of

mechanical nature. Classical radiographs in

general are quite disappointing in this sense

that, certainly if no earlier X-rays are available

as in most cases, very few specific signals are

seen. Some joint space narrowing in one

compartment, some hints for the formation of

what may probably become an osteophyte, and

thus typically at best qualified by a Kellgren I

or Iwano I, could be seen. It reveals very little

of potentially many more tissue processes in

the joint. In addition, the robustness of this last

scoring categories is however difficult, and

studies reveal the quite poor intra- and inter­

reader reproducibility of this scoring system.