Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  291 / 460 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 291 / 460 Next Page
Page Background

M. Odumenya, S.J. Krikler, A.A. Amis

290

means the position of the trochlear prosthesis

in the coronal plane varies considerably and

may affect the pattern of patellar tracking [13]

especially in patients with a propensity to track

laterally. Amis

et al.

[14] also established that

lateral patellar shift is well controlled with a

steep lateral trochlear facet and confirmed the

difference in loading profile of the lateral and

medial facet (60:40) which suggests the lateral

facet should be relatively larger to accommo­

date this. The third-generation designs such as

the FPV® Patello-Femoral Replacement

(Wright Medical Technology Inc., Arlington,

Tennessee), Journey®PFJ (Smith&Nephew®,

Memphis, Tennessee) and Zimmer Gender

Solutions PFJ have been designed as

asymmetrical sided prostheses based on these

biomechanical concepts.

Currently, there are no published data reporting

mid to long-term outcomes on these prostheses,

but the short-term results are promising [15,

16] Although these are all asymmetrical

designs, each implant has a unique selling

point. The FPV trochlear prosthesis was

designed to emulate the normal anatomical

trochlea. The lateral facet of the trochlear

groove is steeper and has a larger surface area

than the medial facet. In contrast to the Avon,

the sulcus angle is even wider, measuring 140°.

The sagittal arc of curvature is 90°, similar to

the Avon, and therefore it matches the distal

femur. Although shorter than the Avon, the

proximal extension of the anterior flange is

long enough to remain in contact with the

patella in full knee extension. Due to the

congruent nature of the trochlear and patellar

components, accurate positioning of both

components is paramount. Unlike the FPV, the

Journey PFA, another asymmetrical third-

generation prosthesis, based on the GENESIS®

II Total Knee System (Smith & Nephew

Fig. 2A-B : [A] The short anterior flange of the Lubinus prosthesis causes the patella to catch or sublux as

it moves from the native femoral articular surface to the prosthesis in the initial 30° of knee flexion. [B] The

Avon prosthesis has a much longer proximal extension of the anterior flange ensuring the patellar

component remains in articulation with the trochlear component in full extension.

Permission to use image granted by copyright owners Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Lonner JH, Patellofemoral

arthroplasty: pros, cons and design considerations. Clin Orthop 2004; 428: 158-65.

A

B