Previous Page  107 / 242 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 107 / 242 Next Page
Page Background

Closing wedge varus tibial osteotomies: Surgical technique and long term results

107

assessment at a mean 10.4 years follow-up

(range: 3.1 years – 16.5 years).

The mean Knee Society objective scores

improved from 53.4 (range, 14-80) to 72.1

(range, 43-95) (p=0.001). The mean Knee

Society function score improved from 78.8

(range, 30-100) to 91.7 (range, 70-100)

(p=0.02). The mean pain score (0-50 points)

improved from 12.2 (range, 0-30) to 32.8

(range 10-45) (p < 0.001).

At the same point, the mean KOOS was 57

(range 20-76), pain: 66 (range 25-94), symptom:

57(range 18 – 82), ADL: 74 (32-96), Sport/rec:

30 (0-65), QOL: 57 (19-94).

Patients’ activity levels outcomes are recorded

table 1. A significant difference was found

between pre and postoperative values.

Radiographic outcomes

A significant difference was found between the

mean preoperative and postoperative values of

mechanical tibiofemoral angle (HKA), MPTA,

and tibial slope (Table 2). No significant

difference was found between the preoperative

Ahlbäck or Iwano grade and the radiographic

assessment of osteoarthritis at the final follow-

up (Table 3). Preoperatively, all patients but 3

had a normal mechanical axis or a valgus

deformity. At final follow-up, all the patients

but one had a varus deformity or normal

mechanical axis. Postoperative varus deformity

of more than 5° was recorded only in 3 patients.

All the patients but two had a postoperative

joint line obliquity under 10°.

Complications and subsequent

procedure

Hardware removal was performed in 6 patients

at a mean 1.7 years follow-up. At the same

time, two patients underwent arthroscopies for

persistent painful swelling. Partial lateral and

medial meniscectomies were performed and

relieved the pain. No major complications such

as infection, thromboembolic events, intra-

articularfractures,neurovascularcomplications,

delayed or non-union were recorded in the

study.

Table 1 : Patients’ activity levels outcomes

Table 2 : Mechanical axes and index

UCLA

asymptomatic

Preoperative

final

Median

9

6

8

Range

4-10

4-9

4-9

N

27

26

18

P<0.001

P<0.001

P=0.001

Preoperative

Post operative

p

Mean

Range

Mean

Range

HKA

184

178-188

178

170-186

<0.001

mLDFA

86

83-89

86

81-89

0.131

MPTA

90

83-94

83

77-89

<0.001

Tibial slope

83

80-87

86

80-90

<0.001

Caton’s index

0.9

0.7-1.3

0.9

0.4-1.4

0.375