Previous Page  102 / 242 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 102 / 242 Next Page
Page Background

F. Lavoie, K. Iguer, F. Al-Shakfa

102

biplanar imaging devices like the EOS

system

TM

, computer-assisted surgery. It will be

interesting to see if these instruments will help

render this technique more reliable and make

orthopedic surgeons more comfortable to

perform it on their patients.

Literature

[1] Cloutier JM. Results of total knee arthroplasty with a

non-constrained prosthesis.

J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65-

7: 906-19.

[2] Komistek RD,Allain J,AndersonDT, Dennis

DA, Goutallier D. In vivo kinematics for subjects with

and without an anterior cruciate ligament.

Clin Orthop Relat

Res 2002-404: 315-25.

[3] Ries MD. Effect of ACL sacrifice, retention, or

substitution on kinematics after TKA.

Orthopedics 2007;

30-8 Suppl: 74-6.

[4] Pritchett JW. Anterior cruciate-retaining total knee

arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty 1996; 11-2: 194-7.

[5] Pritchett JW. Patients prefer a bicruciate-retaining or

the medial pivot total knee prosthesis.

J Arthroplasty 2011;

26-2: 224-8.

[6] Goutallier D, Manicom O, Van Driessche S.

Total knee arthroplasty with bicruciate preservation:

Comparison versus the same posterostabilized design at

eight years follow-up.

Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar

Mot 2008; 94-6: 585-95.

[7] Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. Long-term survivorship

analysis of cruciate-sparing versus cruciate-sacrificing knee

prostheses using meniscal bearings.

Clin Orthop Relat Res

1990-260: 162-9.

[8] Cloutier JM, Sabouret P, Deghrar A. Total

knee arthroplasty with retention of both cruciate ligaments.

A nine to eleven-year follow-up study.

J Bone Joint Surg Am

1999; 81-5: 697-702.

[9] Migaud H, Gougeon F, Diop A, Lavaste F,

DuquennoyA. Cinematic in vivo analysis of the knee: a

comparative study of 4 types of total knee prostheses.

Rev

Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1995; 81-3: 198-210.

[10] Allain J, Goutallier D, Voisin MC.

Macroscopic and histological assessments of the cruciate

ligaments in arthrosis of the knee.

Acta Orthop Scand

2001; 72-3: 266-9.

[11] Cushner FD, La Rosa DF, Vigorita VJ,

Scuderi GR, Scott WN, Insall JN. A quantitative

histologic comparison:ACLdegeneration in the osteoarthritic

knee.

J Arthroplasty 2003; 18-6: 687-92.

[12] Douglas MJ, Hutchison JD, Sutherland

AG. Anterior cruciate ligament integrity in osteoarthritis of

the knee in patients undergoing total knee replacement.

J Orthop Traumatol 2010; 11-3: 149-54.

[13] Hamelynck KJ, Stiehl JB, Voorhorst PE.

LCS Multicenter Worldwide Outcome Study. In: Hamelynck

KJ, Stiehl JB, eds. LCS mobile bearing knee arthroplasty: a

25 years worldwide review:

Springer, 2002: 212-24.

[14] Sabouret P, Lavoie F, Cloutier JM. Total knee

replacement with retention of both cruciate ligaments: a 22-

year follow-up study.

Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B-7: 917-22.

[15] Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson

WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment

of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the

epicondylar axis.

Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993-286: 40-7.

[16]ScuderiGR,BourneRB,NoblePC,Benjamin

JB, Lonner JH, ScottWN. The new Knee Society Knee

Scoring System.

Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470-1: 3-19.

[17] Behrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger JM,

Kuster MS. The “forgotten joint” as the ultimate goal in

joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported

outcome measure.

J Arthroplasty 2012;27-3: 430-6 e1.