219 / 242
Functional assessment: specificity of young patients
219
There is a pre and a post operative version of
the questionnaire, as the patient expectations
section changes following surgical intervention.
This expectation section concerns pain, activi
ties of daily living and sports participation.
The new IKS score is more reliable, compre
hensive and is suitable for young patients. It
eliminates the need to combine several scores,
although psycho-social aspects are still poorly
evaluated. The various test scores (objective,
expectations, satisfaction and function) are
presented separately.
Conclusion
In the field of degenerative pathology of the
knee, assessment tools are numerous. For the
young patient, however, few scores are suitable
for the evaluation of function, particularly with
regard to sporting activities. This usually
requires a combination of different scores. For
simplicity, and in order to increase the reliability
of these tests, the trend is to develop new, easy
to use, self-administered questionnaires,
including further assessment of sporting
activity.
[1] WRIGHT JG, RUDICEL S, FEINSTEIN AR. Ask
patients what they want: evaluation of individual complaints
before total hip replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Br (1994) 76:
229-34.
[2] BAYLEY K, LONDON M, GRUNKEMEISER G,
LANSKY D. Measuring the success of treatment in patients
terms. Med
Care (1995) 33 :AS226-AS35.
[3] WILLKE RJ, BURKE LB, ERICKSON P. Measuring
treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and
other efficacity endpoints in approved products labels.
Control Clin Trials (2004) 25(6): 535-52.
[4] ACQUADRO C, BERZON R, DUBOIS D, LEIDY NK,
MARQUIS P, REVICKI D. Incorporating the patient’s
perpective into drug development and communication: an ad
hoc task force report of the Patient-reported outcomes
(PRO). Harmonization Group meeting at the food and drug
Administration.
Value Health (2003) 6(5): 522-31.
[5] INSALL JN, DORR LD, SCOTT RD. Rational of the
knee society clinical rating system.
Clin Orthop Relat Res
(1989) 248 :13-14.
[6] EWALD FC. The knee scouety total knee arthroplasty
roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system.
Clin
Orthop (1989) 248 :9-12.
[7] LINGARD EA, KATZ JN, WRIGHT RJ, WRIGHT EA,
SLEDGE CB. Validity and responsivenes of the knee society
clinical rating system in comparison with the SF-36 and
WOMAC.
J Bone Surg AM (2001) Dec; 83(12) : 1856-64.
[8] WHITEHOUSE SL, LINGARD EA, KATZ JN,
LEARMONTH ID. Development and testing of a reduced
WOMAC function scale.
J Bone Joint Surg Br (2003)
85B(5): 706-11.
[9] DAWSON J, FITZPATRICK R, MURRAY D, CARR A.
Questionnaire of the perceptions of patients about total knee
replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Br (1998) 80: 63-9.
[10] JENNY JY, DIESINGER Y. Validation of a french
version of the Oxford Knee questionnaire.
Orthop Traumatol
Surg Res (2011) May; 97(3): 267-71.
[11] TEGNER Y, LYSHOLM J. Rating systems in the
evaluation of knee ligament injuries.
Clin Orthop Relat Res
(1985) Sep;(198): 43-9
.
[12] BINKLEY JM, STRATFORD PW, LOTT SA, RIDDLE
DL. The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS): scale
development, measurement properties, and clinical
application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation
Network.
Phys Ther (1999) Apr; 79(4) : 371-83.
[13] ROOS EM, ROOS HP, LOHMANDER LS, EKDAHL
C, BEYNNON BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome
score (KOOS). Development of a self-administred outcome
measure.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther (1998)28: 88-96.
[14] ORNETTI P, PARRATTE S, GOSSEC L, TAVERNIER
C, ARGENSON JN, ROOS EM, GUILLEMIN F,
MAILLEFERT JF. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation
of the French version of the Knee injury and osteoarthritis
outcome (KOOS) in knee osteoarthritis patients.
Osteoarthritis cartilage (2008) Apr ; 16(4): 423-8.
[15] SEEDHOMBB,WALLBRIDGENC.Walking activities
and wear of prostheses.
Ann Rheum Dis (1985); 44 : 838.
[16] IRRGANG JJ, ANDERSON AF, BOLAND AL,
HERNER CD, KUROSAKA M, NEYRET P
et al.
Development and validation of international knee
documentation committee subject knee form.
Am J Sport
Med (2001); 29: 600-13.
[17] RAT AC, COSTE J, POUCHOT J. OAKHQOL: a new
instrument to measure quality of life in knee and hip
osteoarthritis.
J Clin Epidemiol (2005) 58 : 47-55.
[18] WARE J
et al.
A 12 item short form health survey:
construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and
validity.
Med care (1996), 34 : 220-33.
[19]SCUDERIGR,BOURNERB,NOBLEPC,BENJAMIN
JB, LONNER LH, SCOTT WN. The new knee society knee
scoring system.
Clin Orthop Relat res (2012) Jan; 470(1):
3-19.
[20] NOBLE PC, SCUDERI GR, BREKKEAC, SIKORSKII
A, BENJAMIN JB, LONNER JH
et al.
Development of a
new knee society clinical rating system.
Clin Orthop Relat
Res (2012) 470(1): 20-32.
[21] DEBETTE C, PARRATTE S, MAUCORT-BOULCH
D, BLANCG, PAULYV, LUSTIG S, SERVIEN E, NEYRET
P, ARGENSON JN. French adaptation of the new Knee
Society Scoring system for total knee arthroplasty.
Orthop
Traumatol Surg res (2014) [Epub ahead of print].
Literature