LIVRE JDG 2014

T. Ait Si Selmi, D. Shepherd, M.Bonnin

[57] Emerson RH J

, Martinez J. Men versus women:

does size matter in total knee arthroplasty?

Clin Orthop

Relat Res; 2008: 466(11): 2706-10.

[58] Nam D, Abdel MP, Cross MB, LaMont LE,

Reinhardt KR, McArthur BA, Mayman DJ,

Hanssen AD, Sculco TP. The management of extensor

mechanism complications in total knee arthroplasty. AAOS

exhibit selection.

J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014: 19; 96(6).

[59] Martin S, Saurez A, Ismaily S, Ashfaq K,

Noble P, Incavo SJ. Maximizing tibial coverage is

detrimental to proper rotational alignment.

Clin Orthop

Relat Res; 2014: 472(1): 121-5.

[60] Lemaire P, Pioletti DP, Meyer FM, Meuli R,

Dörfl J, Leyvraz PF. Tibialcomponent positioning in

total knee arthroplasty: bone coverage and extensor apparatus

alignment.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 1997:

5(4): 251-7.

[61] Incavo SJ, Ronchetti PJ, Howe JG,

Tranowski JP. Tibial plateau coverage in total knee

arthroplasty.

Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994:(299): 81-5.

[62] Berend ME, Small SR, Ritter MA, Buckley

CA. The effects of bone resection depth and malalignment

on strain in the proximal tibia after total knee arthroplasty.

Arthroplasty; 2010: 25(2): 314-8.

[63] Maes M, Luyckx T, Bellemans J. Does a

conservative tibial cut in conventional total knee arthroplasty

violate the deep medial collateral ligament?

Knee Surg Sports

Traumatol Arthrosc; 2013:14. [Epub ahead of print].

[64] Andriacchi TP, Yoder D, Conley A,

Rosenberg A, Sum J, Galante JO. Patellofemoral

design influences function following total knee arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty; 1997: 12(3): 243-9.

[65] Stoddard JE, Deehan DJ, Bull AM,

McCaskie AW, Amis AA. No difference in patellar

tracking between symmetrical and asymmetrical femoral

component designs in TKA.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol

Arthrosc ; 2014: 22(3): 534-42.

[66] Indelli PF, Marcucci M, Cariello D, Poli P,

Innocenti M. Contemporary femoral designs in total

knee arthroplasty: effects on the patello-femoral congruence.

Int Orthop ; 2012 :36(6): 1167-73.

[67] Fu Y1, Wang G, Fu Q. Patellar resurfacing in total

knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.

Knee

Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2011:19(9): 1460-6.

[68] Breeman S, Campbell M, Dakin H, Fiddian

N, Fitzpatrick R, Grant A, GrayA, Johnston L,

Maclennan G, Morris R, Murray D; KAT Trial

Group. Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: five-

year clinical and economic results of a large randomized

controlled trial.

J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 2011: 17;93(16):

1473-81.

[69] Baker PN, Petheram T, Dowen D, Jameson

SS, Avery PJ, Reed MR, Deehan DJ. Early PROMs

following total knee arthroplasty-functional outcome

dependent on patella resurfacing.

J Arthroplasty ; 2014

:29(2): 314-9.

[70] PavlouG, MeyerC, LeonidouA,As-Sultany

M, West R, Tsiridis E. Patellar resurfacing in total knee

arthroplasty: does design matter? A meta-analysis of 7075

cases.

J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011: 20; 93(14): 1301-9.

[71] Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Saffarini M,

Colle F, Sharma B, Kinov PS, Marcacci M,

Dejour D. Comparison of stability and kinematics of the

natural knee versus a PS TKA with a ‘third condyle’.

Knee

Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2014: 22(8): 1778-85.

[72] Gómez-Barrena E, Fernandez-García C,

Fernandez-Bravo

Cutillas-Ruiz

Bermejo-Fernandez G. Functional performance with

a single-radius femoral design total knee arthroplasty.

Clin

Orthop Relat Res; 2010: 468(5): 1214-20.

[73] Choi WC, Lee S, Seong SC, Jung JH, Lee MC.

Comparison between standard and high-flexion posterior-

stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing total knee

arthroplasties: a randomized controlled study.

J Bone Joint

Surg Am; 2010:17; 92(16): 2634-42

[74] Hepinstall MS, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS.

High-flexion total knee replacement: functional outcome at

one year.

HSS J ; 2010 : 6(2):138-44.

[75] Kim YH, Kim JS, Choe JW, Kim HJ. Long-term

comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee

replacements in patients younger than fifty-one years of age

with osteoarthritis.

J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012: 16; 94(10):

866-73.

[76] Swanik CB, Lephart SM, Rubash HE.

Proprioception, kinesthesia, and balance after total knee

arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized

prostheses.

J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 2004 : 86-A(2): 328-34.

[77] Jacobs WC, Clement DJ, Wymenga AB.

Retention versus removal of the posterior cruciate ligament

in total knee replacement: a systematic literature review

within the Cochrane framework.

Acta Orthop ; 2005 : 76(6):

757-68.

[78] Verra WC1, van den Boom LG, Jacobs W,

Clement DJ, Wymenga AA, Nelissen RG.

Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament

in total knee arthroplasty for treating osteoarthritis.

Cochrane

Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct 11;10.

[79] Scott DF, Smith RR. A Prospective, Randomized

Comparison of Posterior Stabilized Versus Cruciate-

Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Report

With Minimum 2-Year Results.

J Arthroplasty. 2014: 24.

[80] Nunley RM, Nam D, Berend KR, Lombardi

AV, Dennis DA, Della Valle CJ, Barrack RL.

New Total Knee Arthroplasty Designs: Do Young Patients

Notice?

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun 6. [Epub ahead

of print].