Previous Page  93 / 242 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 93 / 242 Next Page
Page Background

Custom anatomic CR TKR

93

Variable thick medial and lateral inserts allow a

90 degree cut perpendicular to the tibial

mechanical axis, but restore proximal tibial

anatomy.

Restauration of the distal femoral condylar

anatomy and proximal tibial joint line restore

and correct the limb malalignment (fig. 4).

Rotation of the femoral component is based on

the restoration of medial and lateral J-curves.

The rotation of the tibial component is designed

using the Cobb’s method [4] but slight

undersizing allows correction of rotation if

necessary following either the position of the

tibial tray during range of motion or orienting

the component toward the tibial tubercle as

recommended by Lawrie

et al.

[9].

Early clinical results report less blood loss,

bone preservation.

Early cadaveric kinematics studies confirm the

hypothesis that restoration of the distal femur

and proximal tibia resemble more closely

normal knee knee kinematics compared to off-

the-shelf implants comparing knee kinematics

before and after surgery [10].

Early clinical results are encouraging and report

less bone resection, less ligament releases and

good mechanical alignment [11-13].

Fig. 4 a and b: In custom TKR the distal femoral condylar geometry is restored and based on a perpendicular

cut of the tibia the space on the lateral side is filled with polyethylene to restore overall alignment.

Literature

[1] Mahoney OM, Kinsey T. Overhang of the femoral

component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical

consequences.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(5): 1115-21.

doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00434.

[2] Bedard M, Vince KG, Redfern J, Collen SR.

Internal rotation of the tibial component is frequent in stiff

total knee arthroplasty.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(8):

2346-55. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-1889-8.

[3] Nicoll D, RowleyDI. Internal rotational error of the

tibial component is a major cause of pain after total knee

replacement.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery British

volume. 2010; 92(9): 1238-44. doi:10.1302/0301-

620X.92B9.23516.

[4] Cobb JP, Dixon H, Dandachli W, Iranpour F.

The anatomical tibial axis: reliable rotational orientation in

knee replacement.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery

British volume. 2008; 90(8): 1032-8. doi:10.1302/0301-

620X.90B8.19905.

[5] Hunter DJ, Niu J, Felson DT,

et al.

Knee alignment

does not predict incident osteoarthritis: the Framingham