Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  80 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 80 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

GRAFT FIXATION

79

TIBIAL FIXATION

For BPTB graft, as for femoral fixation,

interference screws are more commonly used

but staples and screw post and suture can also

be used.

For hamstring and other soft tissue grafts,

similar to bone plug fixation, soft tissue fixation

on the tibial side can be achieved with the use

of interference screws, staples, a screw and

washer, or a screw post and suture.

But this is usually the site of fixation failure

mostly by slippage because there is no bone plug

and it seems that a double fixation should be the

best option when using screw fixation. Another

option may be the use of adjustable suspensory

device such as Tightrope (Arthrex) or Pull-up

(SBM), for example, but further studies are

needed to evaluate these devices on the tibial

side and to be sure there is no distension.

Robert and coworkers have shown in an in

vitro study the superiority of the tape locking

screw (TLS FH Orthopedics) and the Delta

Screw (Arthrex) over the Washerlock (Biomet)

and Tightrope (Arthrex), but further clinical

studies are needed [10].

CONCLUSION

Actually, there is no ideal fixation devices.

For fixation of bone plugs, interference screws

remain the gold standard.

The surgeon can either use a metal or a

bioabsorbable screw.

There is currently no recognized gold standard

for soft tissue fixation, and the surgeon is

encouraged to weigh the risks and benefits of

using different devices.

LITERATURE

[1] BRAND J, WEILER A, CABORN DNM, BROWN

CH, JOHNSON DL. Graft fixation in cruciate ligament

reconstruction.

Am J Sports Med 2000 Sep-Oct; 28(5):

761-74.

[2] NOYES FR, BUTLER DL, GROOD ES,

et al.

Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in

knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions.

J Bone Joint Surg

Am 1984 Mar; 66(3): 344-52.

[3] KOUSA P, JARVINEN TLN, VIHAVAINEN M,

et al.

The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation

devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-Part I:

Femoral site and Part II: Tibial site.

Am J Sports Med 2003

Mar-Apr; 31(2): 174-88.

[4] KUROSAKA M, YOSHIYA S, ANDRISH JT. A

biomechanical comparison of different surgical techniques

of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Am J Sports Med 1987 May-Jun; 15(3): 225-9.

[5] WEST RV, HARNER CD. Graft selection in anterior

cruciate ligament reconstruction.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg

2005 May-Jun; 13(3): 197-207.

[6] ZANTOP T, WELBERS B, WEIMANN A,

et al.

Biomechanical evaluation of a new cross-pin technique for

the fixation of different sized bone-patellar tendon-bone

grafts.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2004 Nov;

12(6): 520-7.

[7] ARNOLD MP, BURGER LD, WIRZ D

et al.

The

biomechanical strenght of a hardware-free femoral press-fit

method for ACL bone-tendon-bone graft fixation.

Knee Surg

Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016 Jan 7.

[8] BROWN CH J

R

, WILSON DR, HECKER AT

et al.

Graft-bone motion and tensile properties of hamstring and

patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament femoral graft

fixation under cyclic loading.

Arthroscopy 2004 Nov; 20(9):

922-35.

[9] BARROW AE, PILIA M, GUDA T

, et al.

Femoral

suspension devices for anterior cruciate ligament

reconstruction: do adjustabl loops lengthen?

Am J Sports

Med 2014 Feb; 42(2): 343-9.

[10] ROBERT H, BOWEN M, ODRY G

et al.

A comparison

of four tibial-fixation systems in hamstring-graft anterior

ligament reconstruction.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2015

Feb; 25(2): 339-47.