Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  15 / 324 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 324 Next Page
Page Background

• Two weeks later, intra-observer (ADK) -

and inter-observer (JH) variation measure-

ments were performed in a subset of

20 patients.

A transparent template at a known diameter of

each squares’ edges of 5 mm was used to avoid

the magnification on the X-ray during the digi-

talization of the conventional stress radio-

graphs (fig. 5). The digitalized stress radio-

graphs were measured by using National

Institutes of Health ImageJ (version 1.37,

USA). The centers and the lines that were

constructed by one of the observers were not

seen with this software before the measure-

ments were repeated. All the data was stored in

an Excel XP database (Microsoft Corp,

Redmond, WA) and statistical analysis was

carried out by using SPSS for Windows soft-

ware (Version 15; SPSS, Chicago, Illinois).

Intra- and inter-observer correlation was com-

pleted by using Intraclass correlation coeffi-

cient (ICC) method. The Levene’s method was

used to determine the groups’ variance for

homogeneous. Linear regression analysis was

made by Pearson correlation coefficient (r)

test. The differences between the groups were

examined by using One-way Anova test. If

One-way Anova test showed significance,

Bonferroni post hoc test was used for advan-

ced analysis between the groups. The level of

significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference of age bet-

ween the groups. All the three groups’ variance

for a.HKA (fig. 6) was homogeneous (p=0.95).

No significant difference was found between

the groups for a.HKA (p=0.08) (Table 1).

The tibiofemoral separation angle

on varus

stress

radiograph showed no significant diffe-

rence (p=0.74) in both groups (Table 1).

Similarly, no significant difference in TFS on

valgus stress was found (p=0.08) between the

groups. As a radiologic parameter, mediolateral

laxity by calculating preoperative TFS did not

differed between the groups to give interest in

the preoperative planning of a medial release.

14

es

JOURNÉES LYONNAISES DE CHIRURGIE DU GENOU

14

Fig. 5 : Radiographic samples of the individuals’ from each group.