Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  16 / 324 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 16 / 324 Next Page
Page Background

On varus stress, the mean FTA of the groups

was 174.4° ± 3.2°, 175.0° ± 3.0°, 171.2°

± 4.6°, respectively. There was significant dif-

ference between group 1 to group 3 p=0.00

and group 2 to group 3 p=0.00. On valgus

stress, the mean tibiofemoral anatomical angle

of the groups was 179.5° ± 3.0°, 179.0° ± 2.2°,

175.8° ± 3.9°, respectively. Comparisons of

group 1 to group 2 p=1.0, group 1 to group 3

p=0.00 and group 2 to group 3 p=0.00 showed

significant difference (Table 1). The FTA less

than 175.8° on valgus stress was appeared, as

a significant threshold value, to show the varus

deformity was not reducible and to point out

the necessity of a big release on the concave

side of the deformity.

On the varus stress, the mean medial joint

space width of all the patients’ was 1.5

± 1.2 mm and that increased to 5.5 ± 2.2 mm

on valgus stress. There was no difference bet-

ween the groups (p=0.59 and p=0.17). And

lateral joint space width of all the patients’ that

was 8.5 ± 2.3 mm decreased to 6.4 ± 2.0 mm

ARE STRESS X-RAYS USEFUL TO PLANMEDIAL SOFT TISSUE RELEASE PROCEDURES IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY?

15

Fig. 6 : Histogram showing the mean values

of HKA between the groups.

Group 1

Group 2 Group 3 Intra-

Intra

P

Table 1

(N=64)

(N=37)

(N=19)

tester

tester value

IVV ICC

HKA lecgabucak

Angle (deg)

172,7

±

4,0

172.1

± 3.9

170.4

± 3.8 0.97

-

NS

FT seperation angle

Varus stress(deg)

6.1

±

2.0

6.0

± 2.2

6.4

± 2.2 0.99

0.95 NS

Valgus stress

0.2

±

2.1

1.2

± 1.6

0.7

± 2.0 0.99

0.94 NS

FT anatomical angle

Varus stress (deg)

174.4 ± 3.2 175.0 ± 3.0 171.2 ± 4.6

0.99

0.94 0.00*

Valgus stress

179.5 ± 3.0 179.0 ± 2.2 175.8 ± 3.9

0.99

0.95 0.00*

Med. joint space width

Varus stress (mm)

1.5

±

1.3

1.4

± 1.2

1.2

± 0.8 0.98

-

NS

Valgus stress

5.7

±

2.3

4.9

± 2.2

5.9

± 2.1 0.99

-

NS

Lat. joint space width

Varus stress (mm)

8.6

±

1.8

8.0

± 2.8

9.4

± 2.8 0.98

-

NS

Valgus stress

6.3

±

1.6

6.2

± 2.2

7.4

± 2.5 0.98

-

NS

Table 1 : Radiographic findings

* Comparison of FTA between the groups was statistically significant;

- For varus stress P (gp A-C) = 0.002, P (gp B-C )= 0.00

- For valgus stress P (gp A-C )= 0.00, P (gp B-C) = 0.001