on varus and valgus stress, respectively
(p=0.11 and p=0.90). Neither group showed
any significant medial joint space width or
lateral joint space width on valgus/varus
stress. The joint space measures did not help to
predict the release procedures (p>0.05). The
opening of the medial compartment space was
not reliable evidence in the evaluation of
varus/valgus stress radiographs to plan medial
release and joint reducibility.
Overall ratios of multiple comparisons bet-
ween the measurements (on varus stress late-
ral/medial joint space width, on valgus stress
medial/lateral joint space width, lateral joint
space width on varus/varus stress, medial joint
space width on valgus/varus stress) of the
varus test to that of the valgus test were found
to show no significant difference between the
groups (p>0.05).
Intra- and inter-observer reliability test by ICC
analysis showed no statistically significant dif-
ference between the independent measure-
ments (ICCintra-observer=0.99, ICCinter-
observer=0.95).
DISCUSSION
The issue that the surgeons are facing during
the TKA is how to analyze the reducibility of
the deformity in the pre-operative phase [28].
A non-reducible varus deformity might have
been the cause of some technical difficulties to
achieve a well-balanced TKA. Identifying the
type of deformity (intra- and extra-articular)
are important to plan the soft-tissue release
procedures during TKA. The long-leg radio-
graphs are useful in the evaluation of deformi-
ties and the alignment of the limb [8-14].
Reducibility of the deformity is most com-
monly assessed by physical examination.
However, the reliability of the physical exami-
nation is poor in the arthritis of the knee [16].
In 1979, Coventry described the principles of
stress radiography [8]. By applying forces
across the knee, the degree of involvement of
each compartment with joint space narrowing
and the laxity of the surrounding structures are
revealed. Extra-articular deformities [13, 14],
secondary restraints [29-31] and specific
aspects of osteoarthritic pathology such as
contracted medial structures and osteophytes
[21] appeared to avoid the varus deformity
reducible on valgus stress.
In the previous studies, the results have been
inconsistent for varus-valgus stress examina-
tion by the stage of osteoarthritis [16-19, 21].
Recent work demonstrated the laxity of the
normal knee by stress radiographs. In exten-
sion, the mean femorotibial separation angle
was found 4.9° in varus stress and 2.4° in val-
gus stress in the normal knee [29]. Regarding
to the results for overall patients in our series,
the lateral laxity was found 6.1° in varus stress
and 0.6° in valgus stress. This comparison
strengthened the knowledge of lateral tissues
were stretched and the medial structures were
tightened during the progress of osteoarthritis.
Although varus/valgus stress radiography
seems to have advantages in the planning of pri-
mary TKA [22-24] compared with physical
examination, the reliability of stress radiogra-
phy has not previously been documented.
Hence, an objective documentation is needed
for the assessment of varus-valgus stress X-rays
to take place in the preoperative plan of TKA
and to figure out its usefulness to the surgery.
The medial osteophytes should be removed
before assessing ligamentous balance in the
coronal plane. These factors place conside-
rable doubt on the validity of the preoperative
stress radiography assessments. In the study of
Pottenger [21], the varus-valgus laxity values
were obtained before and after resecting the
marginal osteophytes during TKA surgery. The
study pointed out that the presence of marginal
osteophytes affects the tension of the liga-
ments and stabilizes osteoarthritic knees to
varus-varus motion. Testing the extended knee
may also have demonstrated the amount of
mediolateral laxity to be less because the pos-
terior capsule and the ligaments resist the
medial compartment opening [31]. Therefore,
14
es
JOURNÉES LYONNAISES DE CHIRURGIE DU GENOU
16