Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  307 / 324 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 307 / 324 Next Page
Page Background

14

es

JOURNÉES LYONNAISES DE CHIRURGIE DU GENOU

306

RÉFÉRENCES

[1] AHLBACK S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiogra-

phic investigation.

Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh): Suppl 277:

7-72, 1968.

[2] BARNES CL, SCOTT RD. Popliteus tendon dysfunc-

tion following total knee arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty, 10(4):

543-5, 1995.

[3] BARRETTWP. The need for gender-specific prostheses

in TKA: does size make a difference?

Orthopedics, 29(9

Suppl): S53-5, 2006.

[4] BELLEMANS J, CARPENTIER K, VANDEN-

NEUCKER H, VANLAUWE J, VICTOR J. The John Insall

Award: Both morphotype and gender influence the shape of

the knee in patients undergoing TKA.

Clin Orthop Relat

Res, 468(1): 29-36.

[5] BLACKBURNE JS, PEEL TE. A new method of measu-

ring patellar height.

J Bone Joint Surg Br, 59(2): 241-2, 1977.

[6] BOOTH RE J

r

The gender-specific (female) knee.

Orthopedics, 29(9): 768-9, 2006.

[7] CHIN KR, DALURY DF, ZURAKOWSKI D, SCOTT

RD. Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal

femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty.

J Knee Surg,

15(4): 213-7, 2002.

[8] CLARKE HD, HENTZ JG. Restoration of femoral ana-

tomy in TKA with unisex and gender-specific components.

Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466(11): 2711-6, 2008.

[9] CSINTALAN RP, SCHULZ MM, WOO J,

MCMAHON PJ, LEE TQ. Gender differences in patellofe-

moral joint biomechanics.

Clin Orthop Relat Res, (402):

260-9, 2002.

[10] EWALD FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty

roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system.

Clin

Orthop Relat Res, (248): 9-12, 1989.

[11] FABER SC, ECKSTEIN F, LUKASZ S,

MUHLBAUER R, HOHE J, ENGLMEIER KH, REISER

M. Gender differences in knee joint cartilage thickness,

volume and articular surface areas: assessment with quanti-

tative three-dimensional MR imaging.

Skeletal Radiol,

30(3): 144-50, 2001.

[12] GREENE KA. Gender-specific design in total knee

arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty, 22(7 Suppl 3): 27-31, 2007.

[13] HARWIN SF, GREENE KA, HITT K. Early experien-

ce with a new total knee implant: maximizing range of

motion and function with gender-specific sizing.

Surg

Technol Int, 16: 199-205, 2007.

[14] HITT K, SHURMAN JR 2

ND

, GREENE K,

MCCARTHY J, MOSKAL J, HOEMAN T, MONT MA.

Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correla-

tion to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems.

J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85-A Suppl 4: 115-22, 2003.

[15] INSALL JN, DORR LD, SCOTT RD, SCOTT WN.

Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Clin

Orthop Relat Res, (248): 13-4, 1989.

[16] LIM JT, LUSCOMBE KL, JONES PW, WHITE SH.

The effect of preoperative symptom severity on functional

outcome of total knee replacement—patients with the

lowest preoperative scores achieve the lowest marks.

Knee,

13(3): 216-9, 2006.

[17] LO CS, WANG SJ, WU SS. Knee stiffness on exten-

sion caused by an oversized femoral component after total

knee arthroplasty: a report of two cases and a review of the

literature.

J Arthroplasty, 18(6): 804-8, 2003.

[18] POILVACHE PL, INSALL JN, SCUDERI GR, FONT-

RODRIGUEZ DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the

distal femur in total knee arthroplasty.

Clin Orthop Relat

Res, (331): 35-46, 1996.

[19] PUN SY, RIES MD. Effect of gender and preoperative

diagnosis on results of revision total knee arthroplasty.

Clin

Orthop Relat Res, 466(11): 2701-5, 2008.

[20] RITTER MA, WING JT, BEREND M, DAVIS KE,

MEDING JB. The clinical effect of gender on outcome of

total knee arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty, 23(3): 331-6, 2008.

[21] ROSENSTEIN AD, VEAZEY B, SHEPHARD D, XU

KT. Gender differences in the distal femur dimensions and

variation patterns in relation to TKA component sizing.

Orthopedics, 31(7): 652, 2008.