

14
es
JOURNÉES LYONNAISES DE CHIRURGIE DU GENOU
306
RÉFÉRENCES
[1] AHLBACK S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiogra-
phic investigation.
Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh): Suppl 277:
7-72, 1968.
[2] BARNES CL, SCOTT RD. Popliteus tendon dysfunc-
tion following total knee arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty, 10(4):
543-5, 1995.
[3] BARRETTWP. The need for gender-specific prostheses
in TKA: does size make a difference?
Orthopedics, 29(9
Suppl): S53-5, 2006.
[4] BELLEMANS J, CARPENTIER K, VANDEN-
NEUCKER H, VANLAUWE J, VICTOR J. The John Insall
Award: Both morphotype and gender influence the shape of
the knee in patients undergoing TKA.
Clin Orthop Relat
Res, 468(1): 29-36.
[5] BLACKBURNE JS, PEEL TE. A new method of measu-
ring patellar height.
J Bone Joint Surg Br, 59(2): 241-2, 1977.
[6] BOOTH RE J
r
The gender-specific (female) knee.
Orthopedics, 29(9): 768-9, 2006.
[7] CHIN KR, DALURY DF, ZURAKOWSKI D, SCOTT
RD. Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal
femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty.
J Knee Surg,
15(4): 213-7, 2002.
[8] CLARKE HD, HENTZ JG. Restoration of femoral ana-
tomy in TKA with unisex and gender-specific components.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466(11): 2711-6, 2008.
[9] CSINTALAN RP, SCHULZ MM, WOO J,
MCMAHON PJ, LEE TQ. Gender differences in patellofe-
moral joint biomechanics.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, (402):
260-9, 2002.
[10] EWALD FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty
roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system.
Clin
Orthop Relat Res, (248): 9-12, 1989.
[11] FABER SC, ECKSTEIN F, LUKASZ S,
MUHLBAUER R, HOHE J, ENGLMEIER KH, REISER
M. Gender differences in knee joint cartilage thickness,
volume and articular surface areas: assessment with quanti-
tative three-dimensional MR imaging.
Skeletal Radiol,
30(3): 144-50, 2001.
[12] GREENE KA. Gender-specific design in total knee
arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty, 22(7 Suppl 3): 27-31, 2007.
[13] HARWIN SF, GREENE KA, HITT K. Early experien-
ce with a new total knee implant: maximizing range of
motion and function with gender-specific sizing.
Surg
Technol Int, 16: 199-205, 2007.
[14] HITT K, SHURMAN JR 2
ND
, GREENE K,
MCCARTHY J, MOSKAL J, HOEMAN T, MONT MA.
Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correla-
tion to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems.
J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85-A Suppl 4: 115-22, 2003.
[15] INSALL JN, DORR LD, SCOTT RD, SCOTT WN.
Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.
Clin
Orthop Relat Res, (248): 13-4, 1989.
[16] LIM JT, LUSCOMBE KL, JONES PW, WHITE SH.
The effect of preoperative symptom severity on functional
outcome of total knee replacement—patients with the
lowest preoperative scores achieve the lowest marks.
Knee,
13(3): 216-9, 2006.
[17] LO CS, WANG SJ, WU SS. Knee stiffness on exten-
sion caused by an oversized femoral component after total
knee arthroplasty: a report of two cases and a review of the
literature.
J Arthroplasty, 18(6): 804-8, 2003.
[18] POILVACHE PL, INSALL JN, SCUDERI GR, FONT-
RODRIGUEZ DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the
distal femur in total knee arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop Relat
Res, (331): 35-46, 1996.
[19] PUN SY, RIES MD. Effect of gender and preoperative
diagnosis on results of revision total knee arthroplasty.
Clin
Orthop Relat Res, 466(11): 2701-5, 2008.
[20] RITTER MA, WING JT, BEREND M, DAVIS KE,
MEDING JB. The clinical effect of gender on outcome of
total knee arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty, 23(3): 331-6, 2008.
[21] ROSENSTEIN AD, VEAZEY B, SHEPHARD D, XU
KT. Gender differences in the distal femur dimensions and
variation patterns in relation to TKA component sizing.
Orthopedics, 31(7): 652, 2008.