Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  282 / 460 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 282 / 460 Next Page
Page Background

The Treatment Evolution of Patellofemoral Degeneration, Arthritis, and Arthroplasty

281

orthopedic surgeon came to visit Professor

Ficat in Toulouse. His name was David S.

Hungerford. Trained in England and Germany,

Dr Hungerford provided a timely intellectual

vector between European and North American

orthopedics. The emerging concepts to which

he was introduced regarding the importance of

lower extremity alignment, the “Law of Knee

Valgus”, and the implication to the forces

exerted upon the knee and patellofemoral joint

by malalignment would form a foundation of

thought for much of his career. In addition,

Ficat would impress upon his protege the

potential role of intraosseous hypertension not

only in avascular necrosis of the femoral head,

but as a source of patella pain. Dr Hungerford

would return to assume a leadership position at

The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore. There

he began applying much of what he had learned

in his travels. Two young physicians who came

under his influence were Dr Leadbetter and

Dr Fulkerson. Ficat and Hungerford would

culminate their collaboration in the publication

in 1977 of the most comprehensive treatise up

to the time on disorders of the patellofemoral

joint [4]. The patella was no longer forgotten.

It is important to consider historical

developments in one discipline in the overall

context of technological and societal trends of

the same period. The 1970’s and 80’s were a

dynamic era in the treatment of knee disorders

with respect to: 1) increased diagnostic

capability, eg. arthroscopy, CT, arthrography,

and MRI; 2) the development of reliable knee

arthroplasty, both total and partial; and 3) the

rise of aerobic fitness exercise and wellness

awareness. Patients developed increasing

expectation of improved functional outcomes

with every newly announced advance.

Coincidently, this stimulated the birth and

growth of a whole new orthopaedic

subspecialty-orthopaedic sports medicine. Of

course, in modern Europe there was a long

association of medicine and sport dating back

to the reinstitution of the Olympic Games with

the founding of the Federation Internationale

de Medicine du Sport (FIMS) in 1928.

However, in North America the professional

recognition of the subspecialty began in 1964.

It was then that Dr Jack Hughston started the

planning of what would formally become in

1972 the American Orthopaedic Society for

Sports Medicine. With the blooming of running

exercise, recreational sport, and women’s

athletics, anterior knee pain soon became the

most common knee complaint in the outpatient

orthopedic clinic worldwide.

During this period many surgeons made

contributions to defining the pathology of

chondromalacia, to the correction of

patellofemoral instability and to identifying

the factors contributing to progressive patello­

femoral articular degeneration. Ficat wrote

extensively about the pathology of degenerative

cartilage and fibrillation. He wrote, “the causes

of disorders of articular cartilage are the same

as those of degenerative joint disease… the

three main etiological factors are trauma,

structural disorders, and mechanical problems,

such as dysplasia, patellar instability, and joint

overload” [9]. In 1978, he introduced his

concept of lateral retinacula release for “lateral

hyperpressure syndrome” [10]. The approach

was facilitated by Merchant and Metcalf;

however Ficat forewarned that not all chondral

disease was either progressive or symptomatic

and that the surgery of the chondromalacia is

essentially a surgery of the pain and therefore,

always keeps a bit ofmystery [9]. Unfortunately,

arthroscopic lateral release remains to this day

one of the most over utilized and misapplied of

operations. Radin summed up the operative

strategy of the time when he wrote, “cartilage

fibrillation does not necessarily progress. There

appears to be different mechanical factors

involved in the initiation and the progression of

cartilage changes in osteoarthrosis. This means

there is some rationale behind what we see

clinically happening after successful osteotomy

or other operations that lower the stress on

degenerating joints, and it means that if we can

do something about the level of stress and,

therefore, the level of bone remodeling in

patients with fibrillation, we may be able to

keep that cartilage from further degenerating”

[12]. With such observations, reducing

symptom producing instability and the

unloading of injured or degenerative patello­

femoral cartilage became a prime surgical

motive. Chambat reported the long term results

of distal medial realignment for instability [11].