W.B. Leadbetter
284
term) “comprehensiveknee surgeon”.However,
the advent of second and third generation
prosthetic design predicated upon years of total
joint design, refinements in operative technique,
and improved selection criteria have improved
the outcomes of isolated patellofemoral
arthroplasty [26, 27]. Likewise, biological
restoration is maturing in effectiveness with the
combination of unloading concepts and
improved biotechnology [28]. Yet, as we enter
the 21
st
millennium, the term “chondromalacia
patellae” remains firmly fixed in the clinical
diagnostic lexicon. Indeed, there still remains
what Grelsamer has dubbed a “Tower of
Babble” when one reads the literature of
patellofemoral pain and arthritis. Teige has
summarized the salient issues in this fashion:
1) bone architecture dictates where the force
vectors acting on the patella will be directed; 2)
abnormal skeletal alignment may alter the
displacementforcesactingonthepatellofemoral
joint, causing ligament failure with subsequent
instability; 3) skeletal malalignment may also
increase patellar facet loading leading to
arthrosis; 4) Increased joint loading with the
addition of subluxation may further increase
unit loading. Pain results from this excess load
and tension in the soft tissues or compression
of the articular surfaces; 5) treatment depends
on the primary pathology [30].
Literature
[1] Fithian DC. A historical perspective of anterior knee
pain.
Sports Med and Arthroscopy Rev. 2001; 9: 273-81.
[2] Dahm DL, Al-Rayashi W, Dajani K
et al
.
Patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in
patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis.
Am J
Orthop. 2010; 39(10): 487-91.
[3] Keuttner KE, Schleyerbach R, Peyron J
et
al.
Articular Cartilage and Osteoarthritis:
Workshop
Conference Hoechst Werk Kalle-Albert, Ed. Raven Press,
New York. 1991.
[4] Ficat RP, Hungerford DS. Disorders of the
Patello-femoral Joint.
Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD,
USA, 1977.
[5] Lennox IA, Cobb AG, Knowles J, Bentley G.
Knee function after patellectomy. A 12- to 48-year follow-
up.
Journal Bone and Joint surgery 1994; 76 Br: 485-7.
[6] McKeever DC. Patellar prosthesis.
J Bone Joint Surg
1955; 37A:1074-84.
[7] Trillat A, Dejour H, Coutte A. Diagnostic et
traitement des subluxation recidivantes de la rotule.
Rev Chir
Orthop. 1964; 50: 813-24.
[8] Hughston JC, Walsh WM, Puddu G. Patellar
subluxation and dislocation.
Saunders Monographs in
Clinical Orthopedics. Vol. 5 Philadelphia. WB. Saunders,
1984.
[9] Pickett JC, Radin EL. Chondromalacia of the
Patella. Eds.
Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1983.
[10] Ficat P. The syndrome of lateral hyperpressure of the
patella.
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 1978; 44: 65-76.
[11] ChambatP, DejourH.The results of transplantation
of the tibial tubercle after follow-up of 10 years or more.
Orthop Trans 1980;4: 124.
[12] Radin EL. Chondromalacia as a separate entity: new
perspectives on osteoarthrosis.
Bulletin of the Hospital for
Joint Diseases 1979; 40: 84-9.
[13] Maquet P. Advancement of the tibial tuberosity.
Clin
Orthop Relat Res 1976; 115: 225-30.
[14] Fulkerson JP. Anteromedialization of the tibial
tuberosity for patellofemoral malalignment.
Clin Orthop
1983; 177: 176-81.
[15] Blazina ME, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W,
et al
.
Patellofemoral replacement.
Clin Orthop 1979; 144: 98-
102.
[16] Cartier P, Sanouiller J-L, Khefacha A.
Long – term results with the first patellofemoral prosthesis.
Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 436: 47-54.