Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  341 / 460 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 341 / 460 Next Page
Page Background

O. Courage, L. Malekpour

340

The 17 patients initially included could be

reviewed at 1 year with a clinical examination

and radiographic assessment (front, profile and

patellofemoral contour).

Out of these 17 patients, 8 presented with

anterior knee pain (table 2a), of which half

presented with patellofemoral syndrome (4/17).

Out of these 4 patients presenting with

patellofemoral syndrome, 3 presented with

patellofemoral incongruency (arthroscopic

and/or radiographic) (table 2b). The level of

satisfaction at one year was 11/17 (or 64%)

with a significantly higher level in patients with

patellofemoral congruency (10/17 vs 1/17)

(p=0.027).

The mean Knee Society score was 69.91 [45-

83] for the congruent group versus 46.6 [33-

75] for the non-congruent group (table 3).

Fig. 4b: Incongruent patellofemoral pair: radiographic and arthroscopic.

table 2a

table 2b

Anterior pain

Absence of anterior pain

Congruent 12

5

7

Non-congruent 5

3

2

Patellofemoral pain

Absence of patellofemoral pain

Congruent 12

1

11

Non-congruent 5

3

2

table 3

Knee Society score

Satisfaction

Congruent patellae = 12

45; 58; 78; 81; 70; 83; 78;

64; 76; 67; 68; 71

Mean = 69.91

5 “very satisfied”

5 “satisfied”

2 “not very satisfied”

Non-congruent patellae = 5 33; 38; 75; 42; 45

Mean = 46.6

1 “very satisfied”

2 “not very satisfied”

2 “dissatisfied”