Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  340 / 460 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 340 / 460 Next Page
Page Background

Whether to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty

339

Photographs under arthroscopy were taken

once the femoral and tibial implants were

cemented. This arthroscopy is performed

without water, in order not to compromise the

coupling between the non-resurfaced patella

and the femoral plate. The arthroscope was

passed via an anteromedial portal with the knee

at 45° of flexion.

For characterisation of patellofemoral con­

gruency, both arthroscopic and radiological

congruencies were taken into account. The

arthroscopic images were analysed according

to whether or not the patellar surface was in

contact with the entire centre of the trochlear

groove in the knee at 45° of flexion, the

radiographs according to alignment and the

overall contact surface of the patella.

Arthroscopic congruency was defined as a

harmonious contact of the patella with the

entire trochlear groove, radiographic con­

gruency, as a harmonious contact of the patella

with the entire femoral plate.

A patellofemoral pair was only considered

congruent if, and only if, congruency was

simultaneously found in the arthroscopic

images and the radiographic examination.

At the end of this analysis, each patellofemoral

pair was then classified into 2 groups: congruent

and non-congruent.

The patients were reviewed again at 1 year,

with a clinical and radiological evaluation.

The evaluation at 1 year included the Knee

Society score, the presence of anterior pain

syndrome, the presence of patellofemoral

syndrome, a global evaluation of satisfaction

(“very satisfied”, “satisfied”, “not very

satisfied”, “dissatisfied”).

A Fisher test was used for evaluation of

significance of the results.

Results

Out of the 17 knees included, 12 presented as

congruent patellofemoral pairs and 5 as non-

congruent (fig. 4a, b).

Among these 5 non-congruent pairs, 2 patellae

were classed as Wiberg 2, and 3 as Wiberg 3

(table 1).

Wiberg 1 =4/17

Wiberg 2 =8/17

Wiberg 3 =5/17

Congruent = 12/17

4

6

2

Non-congruent = 5/17

0

2

3

Table 1

Fig. 4a: Congruent patellofemoral pair: radiographic and arthroscopic.