Previous Page  152 / 242 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 152 / 242 Next Page
Page Background

D. Saragaglia, M. Blaysat, M. Grimaldi

152

Drawing on our experience with TKR and HTO

navigation [15, 19, 20] we used the principles

of computer-assisted surgery for double level

osteotomy (DLO) hoping to increase the

accuracy of this difficult procedure. Our

experience is based on 72 DLO performed

between August 2001 and June 2014, out of

600 

personal

computer-assisted

knee

osteotomies for genu varum deformities (12%).

The objective of this article is to present

the clinical and radiological results of the

first 42 patients at a mean follow-up of

46 ± 27 months.

Materialand methods

The series was composed of 38 patients

(4 bilateral), 9 females and 29 males aged from

39 to 64 years (mean age: 50.9 ± 7.1 years). We

operated on 22 right knees and 20 left ones.

The mean BMI was 29.3 ± 4.3 for a mean

height of 171cm and a mean weight of 85.8kg.

For functional assessment, we used the

Lysholm-Tegner score [25] to evaluate patients,

both pre-operatively as post-operatively. We

felt this scoring system was better adapted than

the IKS score usually used to evaluate surgical

treatment for knee osteoarthritis. The mean

score was of 41.2 ± 8.9 points (22-69).

According to modified Ahlbäck criteria [21],

we operated on 9 stage 2, 25 stage 3, 7 stage 4

and 1 stage 5. We measured HKA (Hip-Knee-

Ankle) angle using Ramadier’s protocol [16]

and we also measured the medial distal femoral

mechanical axis (MDFMA) and the medial

proximal tibial mechanical axis (MPTMA) to

pose the right indication [23]. These measures

were respectively: 167.7° ± 3.5° (159°-172°),

87.28° ± 1.41° (83°-90°) for the MDFMA and

83.51° ± 2.7° (78°-88°) for the MPTMA.

The inclusion criteria were a patient younger

than 65 years old with a severe varus deformity

(more than 8° - HKA angle ≤ to 172°) and a

MDFMA at 91° or less (fig. 2).

All the osteotomies were navigated using the

O

rthopilot

® device

(B-Braun-Aesculap,

Tuttlingen, Germany)

. The procedure was

performed as described previously [23]: after

inserting the rigid-bodies and calibrating the

lower leg, we did first the femoral closing

wedge osteotomy (from 4 to 7mm) which was

fixed by an AO T-Plate, and secondly, after

checking the residual varus, the tibial opening

wedge osteotomy using a B

iosorb

® wedge

(β Tricalcium phosphate, SBM, Lourdes,

France) and a plate (AO T-plate or C-plate).

The goals of the osteotomy were to achieve an

HKA angle of 182° ± 2° and a MPTMA angle

of 90° ± 2°.

The functional results were evaluated not only

according to the Lyshölm-Tegner score [25]

but also to the KOOS score [18]. The patients

answered the questionnaire at revision or by

Fig. 2: Severe genu varum deformity with MDFMA

at 87.8°, MPTMA at 80.4° and HKA angle at 168°.