Previous Page  43 / 242 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 43 / 242 Next Page
Page Background

43

Surgical robotics has been shown to improve

the accuracy of bone preparation and soft tissue

balance in unicondylar knee arthroplasty

(UKA). However, although extensive data have

emerged with regard to a CT scanbased

haptically constrained robotic arm [1], little is

known about the accuracy of a newer

alternative, an imageless robotic system.

The Navio

TM

Precision Freehand Sculpting

system (Navio

TM

; Blue Belt Technologies Inc,

Plymouth, MN, USA) is an imageless handheld

robotic tool (fig. 1). Implant planning and

development of the cutting zone take place

entirely intraoperatively without the need for a

preoperative CTscan. The system continuously

tracks the position of the patient’s lower limb

and the handheld robotic device using an

infrared navigation system. The system is

imageless in as much as it does not use a CT or

MRI to map the femoral and tibial condylar

surface. It therefore relies on accurate

registration of intraoperative knee kinematic

assessment, anatomic landmarks, and surface

mapping of the knee using a calibrated optical

probe designed for use with this robotic

system.

After percutaneous insertion of bicortical

partially threaded pins into the proximal tibia

and distal femur and attachment of optical

tracking arrays (fig. 2), mechanical and

rotational axes of the limb are determined

intraoperatively by establishing the hip, knee,

and ankle centers. Either the kinematic,

anteroposterior (Whiteside) or transepicondylar

axes of the knee are identified and selected to

determine the rotational position of the femoral

component. The condylar anatomy is mapped

out by “painting” the surfaces with the optical

probe. This registration process takes

approximately 5 minutes on average. The

intraoperative data then are used by the system’s

software algorithms to determine the coronal,

sagittal, and axial bone axes and morphology.

A virtual model of the knee is created. Implant

planning for component sizing, alignment, and

volume of bone removal takes place

intraoperatively (fig. 3). The surgeon selects the

implant size that best fits the patient’s anatomy

Robotic Surgery: experience

with Unicondylar Knee

Arthroplasty

S. Lustig, P. Neyret

Fig. 1 : Navio

TM

handpiece