Previous Page  49 / 242 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 49 / 242 Next Page
Page Background

49

Introduction

Results of patellofemoral replacement (PFR)

are poor and compare badly with TKR and

UKR. The inferior results do not relate to

prosthesis failure or loosening and only

partially to progressive degeneration in the

tibio femoral articulation. The poor results

relate to the inability to place a PFR in the exact

position to restore constitutional or natural

tracking in a specific patellofemoral joint.

The patellofemoral joint differs from the rest of

the knee in that it is individualized to each

person, similar to a fingerprint. The reason for

this is that the morphology of both the patella

and its underlying trochlea is the result of the

effect of “form follows function” [1]. This is

the expression of the subtle individual

differences in sagittal, coronal and rotational

alignment of the lower limb as well as the effect

of the angle and forces of the extensor muscles

over the knee joint. As a result of these

individual differences, it is almost impossible

to design instruments and prostheses where

one design fits all.

There should not only be a smooth transition

between the trochlear prosthesis and the

surrounding cartilage, but also the restored

trochlear groove should have proper axial and

rotational alignment. In order to achieve this,

there should be an exact fit distally, medially

and laterally. The fit on the surrounding articular

cartilage will have an effect on the trochlear

groove angle and the rotational alignment in

both the axial and sagittal planes. In practice,

there is often a conflict between good prosthesis

articular transition and the correct trochlear

groove and rotational alignment. In these

situations correct axial and rotational alignment

can often only be achieved at the expense of a

bad prosthesis articular cartilage junction or

vice versa. It is in this respect that:

1)

3D based

preoperative planning and predicted patella

tracking,

2)

patient-specific instrumentation,

3)

surgical robots and

4)

possibly patient-specific

prostheses can be warranted. Each of these

topics will be highlighted and briefly discussed

in the following sections of the report.

3D preoperative

planning

By obtaining full lower limb CT scans,

preferably with 1 mm slices and an MRI of the

knee, it is possible to create a virtual image of

the bony and articular cartilage of the lower

extremity of the knee.

Onthe3Dreconstructionsthroughsegmentation

techniques, it is possible to obtain an exact

measurement of prosthesis-articular cartilage

Robotic surgery and

intelligent intruments

Patellofemoral Arthroplasties

P. Erasmus, K.J. Cho, J.H. Müller