Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  166 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 166 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

TIBIAL SLOPE AND ACL RUPTURE: MRI ASSESSMENT

165

DISCUSSION

Some studies found that the measurement of

posterior slope using lateral radiographs and

the measurement of meniscal insertion using

sagittal MRI images were both reproducible

and reliable [12], in contrast Han

et al.

[17]

declare that tibial slopes obtained from

conventional plain X-rays are of limited value

because they have poor reproducibility, caused

by tibial rotation in lateral view. The problem

inherent to the measurement of the tibial slope

on the short sagittal MRI sections of the knee is

the impossibility to adequately determine the

PTAA. To determine the PTAA, a section

covering a minimum of 150mm below the joint

gap of the knee is necessary [12].

The true tibial slope should be based on

measurements made at the center of the

articular regions of the medial and lateral

compartments of the tibial plateau.

The most important finding of the present study

was that the soft tissue tibial slope can be

measured reliably using an MRI-based method

where our results showed high ICC for all the

variants which reveal strong agreement

between the observers for all measurements.

It was hypothesized that patients with ACL

injury have larger tibial slope than normal

people and within the injured group, the lateral

tibial slope is larger than the medial one. The

results supported this hypothesis. Our results

are somehow similar to those observed by

Matsuda

et al.

[18], who reported a range of 5°

to 15.5° for medial tibial slope and a range of

0° to 14.5° for lateral tibial slope in their study

of subjects with normal knees.

Our results agreed with Brandon

et al.

[13]

who found that ACL-insufficient patients had a

significantly greater PTS than their negative

controls. In a resemble Studies, Todd

et al.

[19]

found that subjects in the noncontact ACL

group had significantly greater slope angles

than did control subjects. Stijak

et al.

[21]

found that the tibial slope on the lateral plateau

had a significantly higher value in the ACL

group than in the control group. The anterior

tibial translation during flexion was greater on

the lateral tibial plateau. This can explain why

the additional increase in the tibial slope

imparted stress on the ACL that could result in

its rupture.

The axial compression of a knee with a higher

LTS compared with MTS may cause greater

anterior motion of the lateral compartment of

the tibia compared with the medial one,

creating a net internal rotation of the tibia with

respect to the femur, which may increase

loading on the ACL [21]. Dejour and Bonnin

[24] demonstrated a mean 6mm increase in

anterior tibial translation (ATT) for each 10°

increase in posterior tibial slope in ACL-

deficient patients and healthy controls.

The effect of the posterior slope on knee

kinematics may be altered by the menisci.

Thus, the STS may reflect the true relationship

between the femoral & tibial condyles.

It was hypothesized that the soft tissues would

influence the slope in both compartments.

In contrast to the similar study of Lustig

et al.

[13] who declared that the menisci shift the

tibial slope towards the horizontal and the soft

tissue slope is more horizontal in the lateral

compartment of the knee compared to the

medial one, we found that the meniscal slope

was large in the injured group than the normal

and the soft tissue slope is more horizontal in

the lateral compartment of the knee compared

to the medial one.

Table 4:

Represents the result of comparison of the

variants between examined and control groups

using independent student

t

-test:

Variants

t

-test

SD DOF

P

Value

LTS 6.76 3.30 198 0.0001

MTS 4.85 3.53 198 0.0001

LMS 5.67 4.80 198 0.0001

MMS 4.61 3.59 198 0.0001

SD:

standard deviation,

DOF:

degree of

freedom,

p

:

probability