Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  161 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 161 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

S. LUSTIG, A. ELMANSORI, T. LORDING, E. SERVIEN, P. NEYRET

160

The medial and lateral PTS are not necessarily

identical in one given knee and differences of as

much as 27° have been reported in cadaveric

studies [14]. An increased lateral tibial slope

relative to the medial tibial slope can influence

dynamic landing biomechanics by coupling

knee abduction with internal tibial rotation [12].

Various models for PTS measurement on

conventional lateral radiographs have been

described, however it is still imprecise. As a

consequence of superimposition, the lateral

tibial plateau is difficult to identify and separate

assessment of the plateaus is not reliably

possible on lateral radiographs [14].

Previous studies have validated different

radiographic methods for measuring posterior

tibial slope [12]. No significant difference

exists between radiographs, computed tomo­

graphy, and magnetic resonance imaging

(MRI); recent work has focused on MRI [12].

Although lateral radiographs are better to

assess the medial PTS, they are inadequate for

reliable and separate PTS and MS assessment.

Therefore, it’s recommended to use conven­

tional MRI scans of the knee, because they

allow simple assessment of each plateau

separately and provide the possibility to assess

the MS reliably [6] and methods using three-

dimensional computed reconstructions are

time-consuming and complex [15].

One of the greatest strengths of using MRI for

this application is the ability to visualize the

surface geometry of the articular cartilage.

Because this represents the functional point of

tibiofemoral articulation and is not visible on

radiographs, it permits visualization and

measurement of the separate compartments

and their associated tissue structures [13].

The effects of patient demographics, such as

gender and age, on tibial slope have not been

fully elucidated. Females are at greater risk of

noncontact ACL injury and a steeper tibial

slope has been observed in females [13].

Multiple studies showed that women have a

greater propensity for ACL injury compared to

their male counterparts [3, 4, 6, 20, 21].

It has been suggested that a possible risk factor

for this observation is that women have a nar­

rower notch than men and even smaller ACLs.

Gender-and age-specific assessments of the

STS and BS could be important and may

explain the difference in the incidence of

anterior cruciate ligament rupture between

individuals, as well as differences in function

following high tibial osteotomies [13].

The soft tissues (e.g. cartilage and meniscus)

may influence tibial slope and consequently

play a role in antero-posterior stability of the

knee joint. The posterior horn of the menisci is

thicker than the anterior one, and this could

decrease the postero-distal slope [16].

The aims of this study were to evaluate the

correlation between the tibial slope and the non

contact ACL – injury using MRI, as well as to

determine the effects the menisci on tibial

slope. It was hypothesized that the meniscus

would reduce the differences in slope between

the medial and lateral compartments of the

same knee. In addition, it was hypothesized

that the presence of meniscus would correct the

bony inclination of the tibial slope towards the

horizontal.

SUBJECTS AND METHOD

A large group from the Croix-Rousse Hospital

in Lyon city was followed from January 2012

to December 2015. The patients were accepted

for knee interventions; none were diagnosed

with gonarthrosis. Two groups of patients were

established. The examined group consisted of

100 patients (67 male & 33 female) with

isolated complete or partial ruptures of the

ACL injury with age group 18-63 (Mean ± SD,

33.76 ± 10.81). The control group consisted of

100 patients whose major complaint was

patella-femoral pain and their MRIs reveled

intact ACL (52 male & 48 female) and their

ages were ranged from 18-86 (Mean ± SD,

43.65 ± 15.96).

Approval was obtained from the ethics

committee of the medical institution at which

the patients were treated.