Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  68 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 68 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

67

INTRODUCTION

Rotatory knee laxity is controlled by the

cruciate ligaments and secondary restraints,

such as the capsule, menisci, collateral

ligaments, and the iliotibial band (ITB).

Clinical diagnosis of rotatory knee laxity can

be performed by static and dynamic rotatory

laxity tests. Static laxity testing is simple and

non-invasive. It measures rotation of the tibia

with respect to the femur and is not yet used in

daily clinical practice. The goal of knee laxity

measurements is to identify the laxity pattern

of an individual patient, improve the diagnosis

of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and

peripheral injuries as well as the clinical

outcome following ACL reconstruction

surgery. The contribution of rotational laxity in

this concept still needs to be defined.

Historically, Wang and Walkers analyzed

rotational laxity in cadavers. They recorded

torque-rotation graphs from each cadaver knee

they examined and noticed a high inter­

individual variability. Our own experiments

showed that cutting the PL bundle of the ACL

lead in average to a 10% increase in rotation,

whereas the section of both bundles induced a

15% increase in rotation with a torque of 5 N/m

at 30° of flexion (Lorbach).

A first attempt to measure rotation in vivo has

been performed by Zarins in 1983. With

increasing awareness of the importance of

rotational control after ACL reconstruction,

several devices to analyze rotation were

developed by groups from Pittsburgh (Musahl),

Vermont (Shultz), Luxembourg (Lorbach,

Mouton, Seil), Decatur (Branch) with devices

analyzing rotation. Each device is different,

and the applied measurement conditions vary

widely, mainly with respect to patient position­

ing, knee flexion angle, and the applied torques.

The amount of torque applied usually varies

between 5 and 15 Nm depending on lower limb

fixation and patient comfort. Knee rotation is

higher if the knee is flexed at 90° compared to

20° and if the hip is extended compared to the

flexed position at 90°. To avoid overestimation

of the measurements when rotation is measured

at the foot, a solution is to measure tibial

rotation directly at the proximal tibia

via

electromagnetic sensors (Alam).

In our experimental device, the Rotameter

(Lorbach), the subject is lying prone to

reproduce the dial test position. Hips are

extended and knees flexed at 30°. The Rota­

meter overestimates the total range of rotation

at 5, 10, and 15 Nm by an average of 5, 10, and

25°, respectively. Our current version yields

STATIC ROTATIONAL KNEE

LAXITY MEASUREMENTS AND

ANTEROLATERAL INSTABILITY

R. SEIL, C. MOUTON, D. THEISEN