Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  162 / 324 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 162 / 324 Next Page
Page Background

For several decades accepted theories of nor-

mal knee kinematics have been dominated by

the flawed concept of femoral ‘roll-back’ [in

which the whole femur, medially as well as

laterally, moves posteriorly on the tibia during

flexion]. This has been said to be driven by

tension in the cruciate ligaments [‘the four-bar

linkage concept’]. This model was said to

confer the advantage of maximising flexion

and elongating the patello-femoral lever-arm

in the flexed knee when it is most needed. This

has so dominated thinking that virtually all

current TKR designs incorporate mechanisms,

with or without the PCL, to achieve ‘roll-

back’. Recent kinematic studies of TKRs show

that, especially PCL sparing designs, do not

replicate normal knee motion and therefore

have function compromised.

Using vertical open-access MRI we have the

capability of studying knee kinematics in 3

dimensions whilst weight-bearing in the living

subject.

The Motion of The Bones

Our studies show that in the 0-120° range there

is negligible anteroposterior motion of the

medial femoral condyle, whilst the lateral femo-

ral condyle moves back, by a combination of

rolling and sliding, by an average 22mm [1].

The motion in the medial compartment is

almost pure sliding. This differential medial

and lateral motion equates to axial external

rotation of the femur on the tibia during

flexion. Thus ‘roll-back’ of the whole femur

does not exist (fig. 1).

120° is the limit of active flexion. Further

flexion is a passive phenomenon, and results in

a different pattern of motion: both medial and

lateral femoral condyles move back about

10mm to 140° [1].

The Motion of the Bones and

Articular Contact Points is Not

The Same

Our studies have shown that in contrast to our

observations of bony motion [above], the

motion of points of contact between the femo-

ral condyles and their respective tibial sur-

faces has a different pattern. Both medially

and laterally the contact points move back to

a similar degree [approx 20mm] in the range

0-120° [2]. Laterally the movement is steady

due to the ‘roll-back’ process but medially it

occurs as a rapid transfer of contact about 30°

by a ‘rocking’ process.

161

NORMAL KNEE KINEMATICS

Achieving Deep Flexion Whilst Maintaining Stability

and Optimising Patellofemoral Function

A. WILLIAMS