Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  162 / 460 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 162 / 460 Next Page
Page Background

161

Introduction

Similar to other ligamentous reconstructions,

around the knee, MPFL reconstructions can

lead to complications. These complications

relates to a lack understanding of the biome­

chanics of the MPFL ligament and technical

errors made during the reconstruction.

Biomechanics of the

MPFL

The MPFL should be seen as a check rein in

preventing abnormal lateral movement of the

patella, at and near full extension; it is not

suppose to pull the patella medially and is of no

importance once the patella has engaged the

trochlea [15].

In the literature, on reconstruction of the MPFL,

most authors suggest that the reconstructed

ligament should be isometric. So called most

isometric points [25, 27] for the reconstruction

have been suggested.

However in measurements of the normal length

changes in the MPFL it has repeatedly been

shown to be a non isometric ligament [25, 29].

According to Steensen there is a 5.4mm length

change from 0° to 90° of flexion and an average

of 7.2mm length change from 0° to 120°. It is

important to realize that the MPFL is a non

isometric ligament that is at it’s tightest at full

extension and becomes more lax with flexion,

as the patella engages into the trochlea [15].

Victor [33] confirmed the non isometry of the

MPFL and has suggested that there is a

difference in the non isometry of the proximal

and distal fibres of the MPFL; the proximal

fibres are at their tightest at full extension and

the distal at 30° of flexion. In cadaveric studies

it was shown that an anatomic MPFL

reconstruction will restore patella kinematics

better than an isometric reconstruction [22].

The position of the reconstructed ligament on

the patella has very little effect on the isometry

of the ligament. In contrast the position on the

femur has a major effect on the on the isometry

of the ligament.Amore distal position increases

tightness in extension and laxity in flexion;

conversely a more proximal position results in

a graft that is lax in extension and tight in

flexion (fig. 1).

In nearly all patella dislocations there is

underlying causes like patella alta, trochlear

dysplasia, ligamentous hyper laxity, etc. that

predisposes the patient to a patella dislocation.

Patella alta seems to be the most constant

predisposing factor in patella dislocation [16]

Patella height has an influence on the isometry

of the MPFL, the higher the patella the bigger

Complications after MPFL

reconstruction

P.J. Erasmus, M. Thaunat