Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  173 / 460 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 173 / 460 Next Page
Page Background

D. Dejour, P.G. Ntagiopoulos

172

permanent, habitual, and recurrent patellar

dislocation, in which they started performing

X-ray measurement of the trochlea and its

position related to the anterior femoral cortex.

It is worth mentioning that at the time, surgeons

in Lyon were already using true lateral X-rays

for a different method developed for measuring

anterior tibial translation in ACL ruptures.

They introduced the “crossing sign”, which

became the pathognomonic sign for trochlear

dysplasia on lateral X-rays (fig. 3).

This fundamental work on the definition of

trochlear dysplasia and on its consistent

presence in patients with patellar dislocation

was presented and published in 1987 during the

6

th

edition of the meeting

“Les Journées

Lyonnaises de Chirurgie du Genou”

[12] and

was later issued in 1990 [31]. It was the result

of a huge effort from the whole “Lyon’s School”

of surgeons who studied the radiographic

findings in more than 1,800 patients and

presented their standardized approach on

patellofemoral instability that would be quoted

and followed widely in the future. H. Dejour

and G. Walch introduced the definition of

dysplasia as a shallow, flat or even convex

trochlear groove by using some of the

radiographicmethods of Raguet [32], Maldague

and Malghem [29, 30] and by examining true

lateral X-rays where the posterior femoral

condyles were

superimposed

[8]. They recorded

that trochlear dysplasia was present in 96% of

patients with documented patellar dislocation

and only in 3% of a control population, thus

presenting dysplasia as the

most consistent

anatomic abnormality underlying in patients

with patellofemoral instability

. Yet, the most

important attribution of this classic study was

the introduction of the first

quantitative and

qualitative

criteria of trochlear dysplasia.

H. Dejour and G. Walch described the crossing

sign as a simple yet fundamental qualitative

factor of trochlear dysplasia. It represented the

point where the line of the trochlear floor

intersects the anterior contour of the lateral

femoral condyle and the level where the

trochlea is flat. The crossing sign could have

three different appearances in reference to the

level of the intersection (proximally or distally)

and the symmetry or not of the medial and

lateral femoral condyles (fig. 4). With these

data, the first classification of trochlear

dysplasia was introduced, which was focused

on how proximally or distally (on the flexion-

extension arc of the knee) the trochlea becomes

dysplastic:

Type I

corresponds to minor

dysplasia where the trochlea is flat at only one

point in its superior (proximal) portion and the

condyles are symmetrical,

Type II

has separate

Fig. 3: (Original slide) The

introductionofthe ‘crossing

sign’ as pathognomonic

sign and qualitative factor

for trochlear dysplasia.

Fig. 4: The crossing sign

had 3 different types in

reference to the level of the

intersection (proximally or

distally) and the symmetry

or not of the medial and

lateral femoral condyles.