Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  201 / 460 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 201 / 460 Next Page
Page Background

M. Thaunat, C. Bessiere, N. Pujol, P. Boisrenoult, P Beaufils

200

recession wedge trochleoplasty is a safe

procedure for patellar instability with major

dysplastic trochlea, and effective in preventing

future patellar dislocation and in reducing

anterior knee pain. Since this procedure may

reduce patellofemoral joint reaction force

without modifying patellofemoral congruence,

it should also prevent late patellofemoral

degeneration.

Methods

Patients

Between April 2004 and March 2009, 20

depression trochleoplasties were performed by

three different surgeons in our department on

18 patients (10 female, 8 male; 13 left knees,

7 right knees). One patient could not be

contacted for reassessment and was considered

lost to follow-up; 17 patients (19 knees) were

assessed at last follow-up. Mean age at

operation was 23 years (range, 18 to 45 yrs).

Mean symptom duration before trochleoplasty

was 7 years (range, 1 to 19 yrs); 7 knees had a

total of 15 previous operations (Table 1).

Indications for surgery were either

patellofemoral instability (n=14) or pain (n=5).

Patellofemoral instability was defined as

recurrent subluxation (n=3) or recurrent

dislocation (n=11) associated with dysplasia of

the femoral trochlea. Dysplasia was defined by

positive crossing sign and a trochlear bump,

according to theDejour andWalch classification

(fig. 2) [7]. Persistent retropatellar pain and

crepitus due to trochlear dysplasia was the

indication in the remaining patients, who

experienced either only 1 dislocation (n=4) or

apprehension without dislocation (n=1). All

patients had failed to respond to conservative

treatment. Trochleoplasty was never isolated

but associated to either realignment of the

extensor apparatus or MPFL reconstruction,

according to the “à la carte” surgery concept.

Surgical treatment addressed each of 4 principal

factors whenever present: trochlear dysplasia,

tibial tubercle-trochlear groove offset (TT-TG),

patella alta, and/or patella tilt. All patients were

assessed clinically and had plain radiographs

and CT scans. Plain radiographs in this study

included weight-bearing AP view, non-weight-

bearing lateral view and Merchant view. As

long leg standing X-ray was not included in the

preoperative planning, the mechanical axis of

the leg could not be determined. Lateral views

were used to measure patellar height, according

to the Caton-Deschamps method [8] (normal

range, 0.6 to 1.2), and trochlear dysplasia.

Merchant views were used to measure patellar

tilt angle (PTA), the angle subtended by a line

between the edges of the patella and the

horizontal; a line along the subchondral bone

of the anterior patella can be substituted for the

edge-to-edge line [9]. CT was used to measure

Table 1: Patient demographics. Patellar apprehension was graded from 0 to ++: 0, no apprehension; +,

discomfort on extreme lateral translation of the patellar in extension, or true apprehension with voluntary

quadriceps contraction on lateral translation in extension; and ++, when the patient stops the clinician

touching the patella.