Previous Page  29 / 242 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 29 / 242 Next Page
Page Background

Place of navigation in 2014: why I resolutely navigate all my TKA?

29

Navigation modified also my way of thinking

when regarding the rotation of the femoral

implant. Currently, I externally rotate the

femoral implant in only 10% of the cases and

even I do not hesitate to internally rotate the

implant in 2% of the cases. External rotation is

given when the FMA is in valgus (above 3° of

valgus) and when the flexion gap is tight on the

medial side or lax on the lateral side. Internal

rotation is given when the FMA is in varus

(above 3° of varus) and when the flexion gap is

lax on the medial side. In the other cases, the

femoral prosthesis is implanted parallel to the

posterior bicondylar line with no additional

rotation.

Finally, navigation is very interesting to

evaluate the sagittal balance of the knee that is

flexum or recurvatum, which is not so easy to

measure before and after the implantation of

the prosthesis with a conventional procedure.

In these cases, navigation allows to cut less or

more bone of the distal part of the femur in

order to fit exactly the prosthesis to the

extension gap and to avoid toomuch recurvatum

or flexum.

Why I resolutely

navigate allmy TKA?

Considering everything I’ve learned in

17 years, it seems difficult to do TKA without

navigation. The best indications to use

navigation are severe deformities (fig. 2, 3,

4, 5), malunions of the tibia or the femur [16,

17] (fig. 6, 7, 8, 9 10) and when there is

unremovable femoral hardware [16, 18]

(fig. 10, 11, 12). However these indications are

not so frequent and if one only uses navigation

for these rare cases, the procedure will be very

boring and time consuming for the surgeon and

his entourage. We do well what we do often!

Conclusion

Currently, Computer-assistedTKAis performed

routinely in my department as well as

osteotomies of the knee, UniKA and UniKA

revisions. All the staff of the operative room is

well aware of the functioning of the device and

no time is lost around the operation. It is not

harder to manage than an arthroscopy of the

knee. There is no preoperative constraint to the

surgeon or his team and all decisions are taken

intraoperatively. Despite this fact, the procedure

takes only 5 to 10 minutes more that is

negligible, compared to all the benefits.

Fig. 1: Severe varus deformity of the femur.

The medial FMA is at 80°, that is 10° of

varus. It is impossible to put the femoral

implant at 90° with a conventional ancillary

without tricking with the intra medullary

rod… It is very easy with navigation…