26 / 242
S. Lustig, C. Scholes, S. Oussedik, M. Coolican, D. Parker
26
Literature
[1] Doro LC, Hughes RE, Miller JD,
et al.
The
reproducibility of a kinematically-derived axis of the knee
versus digitized anatomical landmarks using a knee
navigation system.
Open Biomed Eng J 2008; 2:52.
[2] Lustig S, Fleury C, Goy D,
et al.
The accuracy of
acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted system and its
implication for knee arthroplasty.
Knee 2012; 18:15.
[3] Dennis DA, Channer M, Susman MH,
et al.
Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment
systems in total knee arthroplasty
. J Arthroplasty 1993;
8:43.
[4] Engh GA, Petersen TL. Comparative experience
with intramedullary and extramedullary alignment in total
knee arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty 1990; 5:1.
[5] Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R,
et al.
Meta-
analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total
knee arthroplasty surgery
. J Arthroplasty 2007;22: 1097.
[6] Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N,
et al.
Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee
arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty 2012; 27(6): 1177.
[7] Hashemi J, Chandrashekar N, Gill B,
et al.
The geometry of the tibial plateau and its influence on the
biomechanics of the tibiofemoral joint.
J Bone Joint Surg Am
2008; 90: 2724.
[8] Lustig S, Scholes CJ, Oussedik SI, Kinzel V,
Coolican MR, Parker DA. Unsatisfactory accuracy as
determined by computer navigation of VISIONAIRE
patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Mar; 28(3): 469-73.
[9] Scholes C, Sahni V, Lustig S, Parker DA,
Coolican MR. Patient-specific instrumentation for total
knee arthroplasty does not match the pre operative plan as
assessed by intra-operative computer-assisted navigation.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Mar; 22(3):
660-5.