Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  128 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 128 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

127

INTRODUCTION

Data from anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)

registries show that 47-61% of ACL tears are

associated with meniscal lesions [1, 2]. The

most common intra-articular lesion associated

with ACL ruptures involves the posterior horn

of medial meniscus (MM) [3]. A specific type

of MM lesion consists in meniscosynovial or

meniscocapsular tears which can be difficult to

diagnose arthroscopically from the anterior

compartment. These lesions have been

described in the 1980’s by Strobel

et al.

who

called them “ramp” lesions [4]. Increased

attention has been paid to this entity over the

last years [5, 6]. Among the arthroscopic

techniques, the all-inside repair through

standard anterior portal with meniscal suture

anchor devices implants has increased in

popularity because of its easy application [7].

However, complications have been reported

with these devices [8]. Biomechanically, the

horizontal sutures of these devices have inferior

strength compared to the vertical sutures [9].

Morgan described the vertical suture of the

posterior segment of the MM through a

posteromedial portal with a suture hook but

this technique fell out of favor possibly due it

being so technically demanding [10]. However

improved healing rate for posterior horn MM

lesions may be expected with better

visualization; allowing for an improved

diagnosis, an improved quality of the

debridement prior to the repair and the control

of a complete closure of the lesion through a

posteromedial portal with a simple vertical

suture [11].

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the

results of arthroscopic all-inside suture repair of

ramp lesions of the medial meniscus through a

posteromedialportalduringACLreconstruction.

We hypothesize that the technique of ar­

throscopic vertical posterior suture through a

postero-medial portal with a suture hook device

for these peripheral and longitudinal posterior

tears of the MM encountered during ACL

reconstruction will provide clinical results at

least equal to other meniscal repair systemswith

no associated morbidity.

MATERIALAND METHODS

Patients

All patients who underwent a medial meniscal

repair with the Suture lasso device (Suture

lasso, Arthrex, Naples, FL) in conjunction with

primary or revision ACL reconstruction

betwesen October 1

st

2012 and March 15

th

2013

were entered into a prospective ACL re­

construction database. The procedures were

performed by 3 senior surgeons. Inclusion

REPAIR OF MENISCAL RAMP

LESIONS THROUGH A

POSTEROMEDIAL PORTAL DURING

ACL RECONSTRUCTION: outcome

study with a minimum 2-year follow up

M. THAUNAT, N. JAN, J.M. FAYARD, C. KAJETANEK,

C.G. MURPHY, B. PUPIM, R. GARDON,

B. SONNERY-COTTET