Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  43 / 244 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 43 / 244 Next Page
Page Background

B. BORDET, J. BORNE, A. PONSOT, P.F. CHAILLOT, O. FANTINO

42

visible, in contact with the wall of the lateral

meniscus and the meniscal ligament expansions

can be studied [2, 3] (fig. 2).

Several projects are underway to study the

ALL in cases of ACL injury. Helito has shown

an injury in 30% of cases but these injuries are

predominantly proximal [4].

To date, two ultrasonography studies have

described the ALL [5, 6]. Mary Faruch

et al.

’s

study correlated ultrasonographic data and cada­

veric dissections. A recent Japanese study using

real time virtual sonography showed that the

ligament was identified in 100% of cases [7].

In our experience [8] it is possible to explore

the ALL by ultrasound using high frequency

waves.

We study the ligament in a resting position with

the knee bent at 20° and we perform dynamic

flexion and double rotation maneuvers to tense

it in an internal knee rotation.

In a resting position, we clearly see this small,

relaxed, curved fibrillar structure that crosses

the lateral inferior genicular artery (LIGA),

located deeper, in contact with the lateral

meniscal wall. Above, we can see the thin

ligament that crosses the surface of the LCL.

Its femoral enthesis is more difficult to

distinguish due to a large insertion very close

to that of the LCL (fig. 3).

The dynamic maneuvers make the ligament

tense by flexion and internal rotation, with the

ligament approaching the lateral aspect of the

tibial plateau and straightening (fig. 4).

Fig. 2:

MRI of the ALL. 3D 1 mm-section MRIs, T2-weighted images. Axial and coronal multiplanar

reconstructions.

ALL

: anterolateral ligament,

ITB

: iliotibial band,

LCL

: lateral collateral ligament,

BFT

:

biceps femoris tendon.