46 / 244
ANTEROLATERAL LIGAMENT IMAGING
45
CONCLUSION
The ALL is visible using MRI and 3D
acquisition protocols are necessary.
The ALL can also be studied using ultrasound,
which has both the advantage of being a
comparative examination and enabling
dynamic maneuvers.
LITERATURE
[1] KOSY JD, MANDALIA VI, ANASPURE R.
Characterization of the anatomy of the anterolateral ligament
of the knee using magnetic resonance imaging.
Skeletal
Radiol 2015; 44(11): 1647-53.
[2] YOKOSAWA K, SASAKI K, MURAMATSU K, ONO
T, IZAWA H, HACHIYA Y. Visualization of Anterolateral
Ligament of the Knee Using 3D Reconstructed Variable
Refocus Flip Angle-Turbo Spin Echo T2 Weighted Image.
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 2016; 72(5): 416-23.
[3] BORDET B, BORNE J, FANTINO F. Identification du
ligament antérolatéral du genou en IRM.
Journées françaises
de radiologie 2014; Paris, France.
[4] HELITO CP, HELITO PV, COSTA HP, DEMANGE
MK, BORDALO-RODRIGUES M. Assessment of the
Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee by Magnetic Resonance
Imaging in Acute Injuries of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.
Arthroscopy 2016; Epub ahead of print.
[5] CIANCA J, JOHN J, PANDIT S, CHIOU-TAN FY.
Musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging of the recently
described anterolateral ligament of the knee.
Am J Phys Med
Rehabil 2014; 93(2): 186.
[6] CAVAIGNAC E, WYTRYKOWSKI K, REI-NA N,
MURGIER J, LAUMOND G, FARUCH M.
et al.
Ultrasonographic Identification of the Anterolateral
Ligament of the Knee.
Arthroscopy 2016: 120-6.
[7] OSHIMA T, NAKASE J, NUMATA H, TAKATA Y,
TSUCHIYAH. Ultrasonography imaging of the anterolateral
ligament using real-time virtual sonography.
Knee 2016;
23(2): 198-202.
[8] FARUCH M, BORDET B, LAPEGUE F, CAVAIGNAC
E, BORNE J, FANTINO O, SANS N. Echographie du LAL :
LOL ? Actualités en échographie de l’appareil locomoteur.
Paris : Sauramps medical 2015; p. 95-112.