Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  208 / 324 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 208 / 324 Next Page
Page Background

PROBLEMS OF THE PS

DESIGN

The PS design can cause dislocation of the

TKA that does not reduce spontaneously

(fig. 4 right). A dislocation safety factor has

been proposed as a predictor for stability of the

respective prosthetic design [12] (fig. 5). On

the femoral side additional bone resection is

necessary to accommodate the box [6, 2]. But

the foremost problem is the high stress on the

tibial post [16]. Contact stress at the post-cam

mechanism can be as high as 120 MPa in the

worst case scenario, when the femoral compo-

nent is rotated and tilted [15, 1]. Lower but

still critical stresses have been shown by other

authors being as high as 33 MPa [16]. It has

been suggested that a more conforming post-

cam geometry would reduce contact stress by

increasing contact area. In addition it has been

suggested that the contact location at the post

should migrate, not to overload one singular

location at the post. Wear of the post unfortu-

nately cannot be assessed radiologically [4],

but can only be critically evaluated in retrie-

vals [8]. Wear or even breakage of the post are

a predominant problem of PS TKA. Post wear

has been found in 100 % of retrievals of

implants of all designs [5]. Wear can occur not

only on the posterior side where the post-cam

engagement takes place, but as well on the

anterior side if the post-cam mechanism

blocks hyperextension or compensates for the

ACL. The latter has been considered difficult

DIFFERENT TYPES OF POSTERIOR-STABILIZATION IN PS-KNEES

207

Fig. 3 : ML-Fit (arrows) between tibial post

and femoral box will determine whether the

post-box mechanism can compensate for

varus-valgus instability or not.

Fig. 4 : PS prosthesis (I

NTERAX

®, Stryker Howmedica). The tibia dislocated posteriorly when

the patient bent his knee in bed (right). It had to be reduced under anaesthesia.